Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have been shown lack of robustness, as they are vulnerable to small perturbations on the inputs. This has led to safety concerns on applying DNNs to safety-critical domains. Several verification approaches based on constraint solving have been developed to automatically prove or disprove safety properties for DNNs. However, these approaches suffer from the scalability problem, i.e., only small DNNs can be handled. To deal with this, abstraction based approaches have been proposed, but are unfortunately facing the precision problem, i.e., the obtained bounds are often loose. In this paper, we focus on a variety of local robustness properties and a (δ,ε) -global robustness property of DNNs, and investigate novel strategies to combine the constraint solving and abstraction-based approaches to work with these properties: We propose a method to verify local robustness, which improves a recent proposal of analyzing DNNs through the classic abstract interpretation technique, by a novel symbolic propagation technique. Specifically, the values of neurons are represented symbolically and propagated from the input layer to the output layer, on top of the underlying abstract domains. It achieves significantly higher precision and thus can prove more properties. We propose a Lipschitz constant based verification framework. By utilising Lipschitz constants solved by semidefinite programming, we can prove global robustness of DNNs. We show how the Lipschitz constant can be tightened if it is restricted to small regions. A tightened Lipschitz constantcan be helpful in proving local robustness properties. Furthermore, a global Lipschitz constant can be used to accelerate batch local robustness verification, and thus support the verification of global robustness. We show how the proposed abstract interpretation and Lipschitz constant based approaches can benefit from each other to obtain more precise results. Moreover, they can be also exploited and combined to improve constraints based approach. We implement our methods in the tool PRODeep, and conduct detailed experimental results on several benchmarks

A DPLL(T) Framework for Verifying Deep Neural Networks

Harnessing Neuron Stability to Improve DNN Verification

Analyzing Deep Neural Networks with Symbolic Propagation: Towards Higher Precision and Faster Verification

DNNV: A Framework for Deep Neural Network Verification

Who Verifies the Verifiers? A Computer-Checked Implementation of the DPLL Algorithm in Dafny

DeepDyve: Dynamic Verification for Deep Neural Networks

DeepAuto: A First Step Towards Formal Verification of Deep Learning Systems (S).

DelBugV: Delta-Debugging Neural Network Verifiers

A Dual Approach to Scalable Verification of Deep Networks

DeepCDCL: An CDCL-based Neural Network Verification Framework

Enhancing Robustness Verification for Deep Neural Networks Via Symbolic Propagation

ModelVerification.jl: a Comprehensive Toolbox for Formally Verifying Deep Neural Networks

Chordal Sparsity for SDP-based Neural Network Verification

A Certified Proof Checker for Deep Neural Network Verification

Neural Network Verification with Proof Production

A Unified Framework for DPLL(T) + Certificates.

Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervals

UR4NNV: Neural Network Verification, Under-approximation Reachability Works!

NNV: The Neural Network Verification Tool for Deep Neural Networks and Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems

Safety Analysis of Deep Neural Networks

Analyzing neural network behavior through deep statistical model checking