Abstract:Bohmian mechanics (BM) draws a picture of nature, which is completely different from that drawn by standard quantum mechanics (SQM): Particles are at any time at a definite position, and the universe evolves deterministically. Astonishingly, according to a proof by Bohm the empirical predictions of these two very different theories coincide. From the very beginning, BM has faced all kinds of criticism, most of which are either technical or philosophical. There is, however, a criticism first raised by Correggi et al. (2002) and recently strengthened by Kiukas and Werner (2010), which holds that, in spite of Bohm's proof, the predictions of BM do not agree with those of SQM in the case of local position measurements on entangled particles in a stationary state. Hence, given that SQM has been proven to be tremendously successful in the past, BM could most likely not be considered an empirically adequate theory. My aim is to resolve the conflict by showing that 1) it relies on hidden differences in the conceptual thinking, and that 2) the predictions of both theories approximately coincide if the process of measurement is adequately accounted for. My analysis makes no use of any sort of wavefunction collapse, refuting a widespread belief that an "effective collapse" is needed to reconcile BM with the predictions of SQM.

Against the "nightmare of a mechanically determined universe": Why Bohm was never a Bohmian

Orthodox or Dissident? The Evolution of Bohm's Ontological Reflections in the 1950s

Striving for Realism, not for Determinism: Historical Misconceptions on Einstein and Bohm

Why Bohm and Only Bohm?

Bohmian histories and decoherent histories

Is Bohmian Mechanics an empirically adequate theory?

A Vision for a Bohm-Style Theory of Quantum Electrodynamics

Relativistic quantum mechanics and the Bohmian interpretation

Towards a Deterministic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Insights from Dynamical Systems

Why Bohr was wrong in his response to EPR

Bohmian mechanics contradicts quantum mechanics

Arrival time and Bohmian Mechanics: It is the theory which decides what we can measure

Remarks on Consistent Histories and Bohmian Mechanics

Bohr and von Neumann on the universality of quantum mechanics: materials for the history of the quantum measurement process

A Dynamic Histories Interpretation of Quantum Theory

The Determinacy Problem in Quantum Mechanics

Consequences Of A Two-Time Relativistic Bohmian Model

Decoherent Histories and Realism