Stellar Half-Mass Radii of $0.5<z<2.3$ Galaxies: Comparison with JWST/NIRCam Half-Light Radii

Arjen van der Wel,Marco Martorano,Boris Haussler,Kalina V. Nedkova,Tim B. Miller,Gabriel B. Brammer,Glenn van de Ven,Joel Leja,Rachel S. Bezanson,Adam Muzzin,Danilo Marchesini,Anna de Graaff,Mariska Kriek,Eric F. Bell,Marijn Franx

2023-07-07

Abstract:We use CEERS JWST/NIRCam imaging to measure rest-frame near-IR light profiles of $>$500 $M_\star>10^{10}~M_\odot$ galaxies in the redshift range $0.5<z<2.3$. We compare the resulting rest-frame 1.5-2$\mu$m half-light radii ($R_{\rm{NIR}}$) with stellar half-mass radii (\rmass) derived with multi-color light profiles from CANDELS HST imaging. In general agreement with previous work, we find that $R_{\rm{NIR}}$ and \rmass~are up to 40\%~smaller than the rest-frame optical half-light radius $R_{\rm{opt}}$. The agreement between $R_{\rm{NIR}}$ and \rmass~is excellent, with negligible systematic offset ($<$0.03 dex) up to $z=2$ for quiescent galaxies and up to $z=1.5$ for star-forming galaxies. We also deproject the profiles to estimate \rmassd, the radius of a sphere containing 50\% of the stellar mass. We present the $R-M_\star$ distribution of galaxies at $0.5<z<1.5$, comparing $R_{\rm{opt}}$, \rmass~and \rmassd. The slope is significantly flatter for \rmass~and \rmassd~ compared to $R_{\rm{opt}}$, mostly due to downward shifts in size for massive star-forming galaxies, while \rmass~and \rmassd~do not show markedly different trends. Finally, we show rapid size evolution ($R\propto (1+z)^{-1.7\pm0.1}$) for massive ($M_\star>10^{11}~M_\odot$) quiescent galaxies between $z=0.5$ and $z=2.3$, again comparing $R_{\rm{opt}}$, \rmass~and \rmassd. We conclude that the main tenets of the size evolution narrative established over the past 20 years, based on rest-frame optical light profile analysis, still hold in the era of JWST/NIRCam observations in the rest-frame near-IR.

Astrophysics of Galaxies