Directed Poincaré Inequalities and $L^1$ Monotonicity Testing of Lipschitz Functions

Renato Ferreira Pinto Jr

2023-07-05

Abstract:We study the connection between directed isoperimetric inequalities and monotonicity testing. In recent years, this connection has unlocked breakthroughs for testing monotonicity of functions defined on discrete domains. Inspired the rich history of isoperimetric inequalities in continuous settings, we propose that studying the relationship between directed isoperimetry and monotonicity in such settings is essential for understanding the full scope of this connection. Hence, we ask whether directed isoperimetric inequalities hold for functions $f : [0,1]^n \to \mathbb{R}$, and whether this question has implications for monotonicity testing. We answer both questions affirmatively. For Lipschitz functions $f : [0,1]^n \to \mathbb{R}$, we show the inequality $d^{\mathsf{mono}}_1(f) \lesssim \mathbb{E}\left[\|\nabla^- f\|_1\right]$, which upper bounds the $L^1$ distance to monotonicity of $f$ by a measure of its "directed gradient". A key ingredient in our proof is the monotone rearrangement of $f$, which generalizes the classical "sorting operator" to continuous settings. We use this inequality to give an $L^1$ monotonicity tester for Lipschitz functions $f : [0,1]^n \to \mathbb{R}$, and this framework also implies similar results for testing real-valued functions on the hypergrid.

Data Structures and Algorithms

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to explore the relationship between function monotonicity testing on continuous domains and directed isoperimetric inequalities. Specifically, the author studied whether there exists a directed isoperimetric inequality for the function \(f: [0,1]^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) on continuous domains and explored whether such an inequality has an impact on monotonicity testing. By establishing these inequalities, the author hopes to provide a new perspective for understanding the whole picture of function monotonicity testing on discrete and continuous domains.

### Main contributions of the paper

1. **Directed Poincaré inequality**:
- The author proved that for Lipschitz functions \(f: [0,1]^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\), there exists a directed L1 Poincaré inequality:
\[
d_{\text{mono}}^1(f) \lesssim \mathbb{E}[\|\nabla^- f\|_1]
\]
where \(d_{\text{mono}}^1(f)\) represents the distance from \(f\) to any monotonic function, and \(\nabla^- f\) is the directed gradient of \(f\).

2. **Monotonicity testing algorithm**:
- Based on the above inequality, the author proposed an L1 monotonicity testing algorithm for Lipschitz functions \(f: [0,1]^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\), whose query complexity is \(O\left(\frac{nL}{\epsilon}\right)\), where \(L\) is the best Lipschitz constant of \(f\) and \(\epsilon\) is the closeness parameter.

3. **Results on hypercubes**:
- The author also extended these results to real - valued functions \(f: [m]^n \rightarrow \mathbb{R}\) on hypercubes and gave a similar L1 monotonicity testing algorithm.

4. **Query complexity in the one - dimensional case**:
- The author proved that the tight query complexity of L1 monotonicity testing in the one - dimensional case is \(e^{O\left(\sqrt{\frac{mL}{\epsilon}}\right)}\), which is in contrast to the testing results under the Hamming distance.

5. **Lower bound analysis**:
- The author provided two types of lower bounds: the lower bound of general testers and the lower bound of partial derivative testers. These lower bounds show that for partial derivative testers, their analysis is tight.

### Significance of the paper

- **Theoretical contribution**: By establishing the directed Poincaré inequality on continuous domains, this paper fills the gap between discrete and continuous domains in the field of monotonicity testing.
- **Practical application**: The proposed testing algorithm provides an effective tool for dealing with the monotonicity problem of high - dimensional continuous data, and has potential application value especially in fields such as machine learning and data analysis.

### Future work directions

- **Stronger directed Poincaré inequality**: The author proposed some conjectures, such as whether there exists a stronger \(\ell_2\) - form of the directed Poincaré inequality.
- **Better query complexity**: Look for testing algorithms with better dependence on the dimension \(n\), especially consider using different Lipschitz constants (such as \(Lip_2(f)\)) to optimize the query complexity.
- **Tester - independent lower bounds**: Further study tester - independent lower bounds to better understand the theoretical limits of L1 monotonicity testing.

In general, this paper has made important contributions in both theoretical and applied aspects, providing new ideas and directions for subsequent research.