Comparative analysis of full-field OCT and optical transmission tomography

Samer Alhaddad,Olivier Thouvenin,Martine Boccara,Claude Boccara,Viacheslav Mazlin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1364/BOE.494585
2023-07-05
Abstract:This work compares two tomographic imaging technologies, time-domain full-field optical coherence tomography (FFOCT) working in reflection and optical transmission tomography (OTT), using a new optical setup that combines both. We show that, due to forward-scattering properties, the axial sectioning and contrast in OTT can be optimized by tuning illumination. The influence of sample scattering and thickness are discussed. We illustrate the comparison of the two methods in static (morphology) and dynamic (metabolic contrast) regimes using cell cultures, tissues and entire organisms emphasizing the advantages of both approaches.
Optics,Biological Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to conduct a comparative analysis of the performance differences between two optical tomography techniques - Full - Field Optical Coherence Tomography (FFOCT) and Optical Transmission Tomography (OTT) in reflection mode and transmission mode. Specifically, by combining these two techniques on a new optical platform, the researchers explored their static (morphological) and dynamic (metabolic contrast) imaging capabilities in different samples (such as cell cultures, tissues, and whole organisms). The paper also paid special attention to the influence of sample scattering characteristics and thickness on imaging quality, and proposed a method to optimize the axial resolution and contrast of OTT by adjusting the illumination conditions. The key points of the paper include: - **Technical Principles**: FFOCT uses an interferometer and a spectrometer to reconstruct the tomographic image of the sample, while OTT achieves tomographic imaging by controlling the phase delay. - **Relationship between Axial Resolution and Contrast**: In OTT, by adjusting the numerical aperture (NA) of the illumination, the axial resolution can be changed, but this adjustment will lead to a change in contrast. When the illumination NA increases, the axial resolution improves, but at the same time the contrast will decrease. - **Influence of Sample Characteristics**: The thickness and scattering properties of the sample will affect the imaging effect of OTT. For thicker or more strongly scattering samples, the imaging quality of OTT may be limited. - **Comparison of Imaging Results**: The paper shows the imaging results of FFOCT and OTT in transparent zebrafish embryos and mouse organs (such as the brain, peritoneum, and heart) through experiments. FFOCT shows higher axial resolution in volumetric imaging, while OTT provides better overall structure visualization in single - plane imaging and is not affected by the residual interference fringe artifacts common in FFOCT. - **Dynamic Imaging Capability**: Both techniques can be used to detect physiological dynamics, such as blood flow and cell metabolic activities. OTT shows more large particles in transmission mode, which may be glycogen particles in liver cells, and in dynamic imaging, FFOCT and OTT show different signal characteristics in the cytoplasm and nucleus respectively. Overall, this paper aims to provide researchers with a basis for choosing an imaging technique suitable for a specific application scenario through detailed comparative analysis.