What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the problem of how to construct models capable of effective planning in risk - sensitive reinforcement learning. Specifically, the authors focus on how to make risk - sensitive decisions through learning models, rather than traditional risk - neutral decisions. The main contributions of the paper are as follows: 1. **Prove that Proper Value Equivalence is only applicable to risk - neutral optimal planning**: The authors prove that in a risk - sensitive setting, the performance of the Proper Value Equivalence model will decline as the risk sensitivity increases (Section 3). 2. **Introduce the Distribution Equivalence Principle**: This principle can be used for optimal planning under any risk measure, but its computational complexity is relatively high (Section 4). 3. **Propose an approximate version of distribution equivalence**: This version allows the selection of specific risk measures for optimal planning and has practical application value (Section 5). 4. **Discuss how to learn these methods through loss functions and combine them with existing model - free algorithms** (Section 6). 5. **Verify the effectiveness of the framework through tables and large - scale experiments** (Section 7). ### Background of the Paper Reinforcement learning is a general framework in which agents optimize objectives through sequential decision - making, such as the expected value of future rewards (risk - neutral objective) or the conditional value - at - risk of future rewards (risk - sensitive objective). Traditional model - learning methods usually use maximum - likelihood estimation (MLE) to learn environmental models, but in highly stochastic or safety - critical environments, this method may not be sufficient to capture all important environmental characteristics. ### Main Contributions 1. **Theoretical Analysis**: - The authors first prove that Proper Value Equivalence is only applicable to risk - neutral optimal planning. Specifically, if a model is in the Proper Value Equivalence class, then it can perform optimal planning in a risk - neutral setting, but it may not be effective in a risk - sensitive setting (Proposition 3.1). - Further, they show that when using the Proper Value Equivalence model for strict risk - sensitive spectral - risk - measure planning, there is a trade - off between risk sensitivity and performance (Proposition 3.2). 2. **Introduce New Equivalence Concepts**: - **Distribution Equivalence Principle**: The authors introduce the Distribution Equivalence Principle, which is a model - equivalence concept based on the entire return distribution. By matching the return distribution of the model, optimal planning for any risk measure can be achieved (Theorem 4.3). - **Statistical Functional Equivalence**: To address the computational complexity issue of the Distribution Equivalence Principle in practice, the authors propose the concept of statistical functional equivalence. This concept allows the selection of specific risk measures for optimal planning and has practical application value (Definition 5.4 and Proposition 5.5). 3. **Experimental Verification**: - The authors conduct experiments in tabular and continuous environments to verify the effectiveness of the proposed framework. The experimental results show that using models of distribution equivalence or statistical functional equivalence can significantly improve the performance of risk - sensitive tasks. ### Conclusion This paper solves the key problems of model learning in risk - sensitive reinforcement learning by introducing the Distribution Equivalence Principle and the concept of statistical functional equivalence. These methods not only provide a new perspective theoretically but also perform well in practical applications, providing strong support for the optimization of risk - sensitive tasks.

Distributional Model Equivalence for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning

Risk-Averse Model Uncertainty for Distributionally Robust Safe Reinforcement Learning

The Value Equivalence Principle for Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Distributionally Safe Reinforcement Learning under Model Uncertainty: A Single-Level Approach by Differentiable Convex Programming

Between Rate-Distortion Theory & Value Equivalence in Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

Provable Risk-Sensitive Distributional Reinforcement Learning with General Function Approximation

Distributional Method for Risk Averse Reinforcement Learning

Safe Distributional Reinforcement Learning

Model and Reinforcement Learning for Markov Games with Risk Preferences

Value-Distributional Model-Based Reinforcement Learning

A Distributional Perspective on Reinforcement Learning

The Curious Price of Distributional Robustness in Reinforcement Learning with a Generative Model

One Risk to Rule Them All: A Risk-Sensitive Perspective on Model-Based Offline Reinforcement Learning

Equivalence Between Wasserstein and Value-Aware Loss for Model-based Reinforcement Learning

A Distributional Analogue to the Successor Representation

Distributionally Robust Model-based Reinforcement Learning with Large State Spaces

Tractable and Provably Efficient Distributional Reinforcement Learning with General Value Function Approximation

Bridging Distributional and Risk-sensitive Reinforcement Learning with Provable Regret Bounds

Policy Gradient Methods for Risk-Sensitive Distributional Reinforcement Learning with Provable Convergence

Pragmatic Distributionally Robust Optimization for Simple Integer Recourse Models

State-Augmentation Transformations for Risk-Sensitive Reinforcement Learning.