Can Machines Garden? Systematically Comparing the AlphaGarden vs. Professional Horticulturalists

Simeon Adebola,Rishi Parikh,Mark Presten,Satvik Sharma,Shrey Aeron,Ananth Rao,Sandeep Mukherjee,Tomson Qu,Christina Wistrom,Eugen Solowjow,Ken Goldberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.17162

2023-06-30

Abstract:The AlphaGarden is an automated testbed for indoor polyculture farming which combines a first-order plant simulator, a gantry robot, a seed planting algorithm, plant phenotyping and tracking algorithms, irrigation sensors and algorithms, and custom pruning tools and algorithms. In this paper, we systematically compare the performance of the AlphaGarden to professional horticulturalists on the staff of the UC Berkeley Oxford Tract Greenhouse. The humans and the machine tend side-by-side polyculture gardens with the same seed arrangement. We compare performance in terms of canopy coverage, plant diversity, and water consumption. Results from two 60-day cycles suggest that the automated AlphaGarden performs comparably to professional horticulturalists in terms of coverage and diversity, and reduces water consumption by as much as 44%. Code, videos, and datasets are available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://sites.google.com/berkeley.edu/systematiccomparison" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>.

Robotics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: **Can the performance of automated systems in horticultural management be comparable to that of professional horticulturists?**

Specifically, the paper evaluates whether machines can effectively carry out horticultural work by comparing the performance of the automated system AlphaGarden and professional horticulturists in the UC Berkeley Oxford Tract Greenhouse in multi - species mixed - cropping horticultural management. The main performance indicators of concern include:

- **Canopy Coverage (Coverage)**: It refers to the proportion of the ground covered by plants, reflecting the density and health status of plant growth.
- **Plant Diversity (Diversity)**: It measures the richness of different plant species in the planting area.
- **Water Consumption**: It assesses whether the automated system can reduce water consumption while achieving the same or similar horticultural effects.

The paper compared the performance of human experts and AlphaGarden in the above - mentioned indicators through two 60 - day growth - cycle experiments. The results show that AlphaGarden has reached a level comparable to that of human experts in terms of coverage and diversity, while reducing water consumption by 37% to 44%. This indicates that automated systems have significant water - saving advantages in horticultural management and can maintain good plant growth status and diversity.