Abstract:The initial transient phase of an emerging epidemic is of critical importance for data-driven model building, model-based prediction of the epidemic trend, and articulation of control/prevention strategies. In principle, quantitative models for real-world epidemics need to be memory-dependent or non-Markovian, but this presents difficulties for data collection, parameter estimation, computation and analyses. In contrast, the difficulties do not arise in the traditional Markovian models. To uncover the conditions under which Markovian and non-Markovian models are equivalent for transient epidemic dynamics is outstanding and of significant current interest. We develop a comprehensive computational and analytic framework to establish that the transient-state equivalence holds when the average generation time matches and average removal time, resulting in minimal Markovian estimation errors in the basic reproduction number, epidemic forecasting, and evaluation of control strategy. Strikingly, the errors depend on the generation-to-removal time ratio but not on the specific values and distributions of these times, and this universality will further facilitate estimation rectification. Overall, our study provides a general criterion for modeling memory-dependent processes using the Markovian frameworks.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is under what conditions the non - Markovian (memory - dependent) model and the traditional Markovian (memory - less) model can reach approximate equivalence during the initial transient phase of epidemic spread. Specifically, the research aims to determine whether the Markovian model can accurately describe the dynamic characteristics of epidemic spread, especially the accuracy of the estimation of the basic reproduction number \(R_0\), epidemic prediction, and control strategy evaluation when the average generation time and the average removal time in the non - Markovian model are equal. In addition, the research also explores how the error under these conditions depends on the ratio of the generation time to the removal time, rather than their specific values or distribution forms, and this finding is of great significance for practical applications.
### Background of the Paper
In the early stage of an epidemic, that is, before the system reaches a steady state, it is crucial to understand the spread dynamics of the disease. This is because:
1. **Estimation of Key Parameters**: Such as generation time, serial interval, and the basic reproduction number \(R_0\), these parameters need to be accurately estimated when the disease spread has not yet reached a steady state.
2. **Effectiveness of Control Strategies**: Only during the transient phase can control and mitigation measures be effectively used to prevent large - scale epidemic outbreaks.
However, epidemic spread in the real world is usually memory - dependent (non - Markovian), which means that state evolution depends on history. This brings great challenges to data collection, parameter estimation, calculation, and analysis. In contrast, the traditional Markovian model does not have these problems, but its assumed memory - less property may not be applicable to all cases.
### Research Objectives
The main purpose of the paper is to determine, through a comprehensive computational and analytical framework, under what conditions the Markovian model can be approximately equivalent to the non - Markovian model, especially during the transient phase of epidemic spread. Specifically, the research focuses on the following two questions:
1. **Transient Equivalence**: Under what conditions do the non - Markovian model and the Markovian model exhibit similar behaviors during the transient phase?
2. **Error Analysis**: How is the error of the Markovian model determined when estimating \(R_0\), epidemic prediction, and control strategy evaluation?
### Main Findings
1. **Steady - State Equivalence**: In the steady state, the non - Markovian spread process is always equivalent to some Markovian processes.
2. **Transient Equivalence**: During the transient phase, approximate equivalence can be achieved when the average generation time \(T_{\text{gen}}\) in the non - Markovian spread dynamics is equal to the average removal time \(T_{\text{rem}}\). This equivalence makes the relationship between the infection and removal processes memory - less, thereby minimizing the influence of memory effects.
3. **Error Dependence**: The error of the Markovian model mainly depends on the ratio of the generation time to the removal time, rather than the specific values or distribution forms of these times. Specifically, if the average generation time is less than the average removal time, the Markovian model will overestimate \(R_0\) and epidemic prediction; otherwise, it will underestimate.
### Practical Significance
This research provides a general criterion for modeling memory - dependent processes within the Markovian framework. Once the conditions for transient equivalence are met, the Markovian model can be used for epidemic prediction and control strategy evaluation without the need for complex non - Markovian models. In addition, the research has also developed a semi - empirical mathematical relationship for connecting the \(R_0\) estimation error with the ratio of the generation time to the removal time, which is of great value in practical applications.