Sciama's argument on life in a random universe: Distinguishing apples from oranges

Zhi-Wei Wang,Samuel L. Braunstein
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41550-023-02014-9
2023-06-26
Abstract:Dennis Sciama argued that the existence of life depended on many quantities, the fundamental constants, so in a random universe life should be highly unlikely. However, without full knowledge of these constants, his argument implies a universe that would appear to be `intelligently designed.'
History and Philosophy of Physics,Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics,Artificial Intelligence,General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is about the probability of the existence of life in the universe and its relationship with fundamental physical constants. Specifically, the paper explores the view put forward by Dennis Sciama: in a randomly generated universe, due to the wide and random range of values of fundamental physical constants, the existence of life should be extremely improbable. However, this view implies a seemingly "intelligent - design" universe, because only specific values of fundamental constants can support the existence of human life. ### Main problems 1. **Sciama's argument**: - Sciama believes that if our universe is randomly generated, then it will almost certainly have a very low probability of supporting life forms like us. - He assumes that the differences between different potential universes lie in the specific values of fundamental physical constants, and the range of these constants is very wide. 2. **The "island" model in high - dimensional space**: - The paper describes the universe that can support human life as an "island" in high - dimensional space, while other universes that cannot support life form the "ocean". - The boundary of this "island" (i.e., the "coastline") corresponds to those universes where the probability of life existence is close to zero. - According to the "phenomenon of concentration of measure" in high - dimensional geometry, a randomly selected universe is more likely to appear on the edge of the "island" rather than inside. 3. **Re - examination of Sciama's argument**: - If our understanding of fundamental physical constants is incomplete, then the projection of this "island" in low - dimensional space will present a different shape, similar to an "apple" rather than an "orange". - In this case, a randomly selected universe is more likely to appear in the central area of the "island", which is more in line with the view of "intelligent design". ### Main contributions of the paper - **Re - interpreting Sciama's argument**: By introducing high - dimensional geometry and the phenomenon of concentration of measure, the paper presents a new perspective to understand Sciama's view. - **Discussing the impact of incomplete knowledge**: The paper points out that if our understanding of fundamental physical constants is incomplete, then a randomly selected universe may exhibit characteristics similar to "intelligent design". - **Prospects for future research**: The paper proposes that with the discovery of more fundamental physical constants, we can better understand the randomness of the universe and its impact on the existence of life. ### Conclusion Through the analysis of the "island" model in high - dimensional space, this paper re - examines Sciama's view on the probability of life existence in a random universe and points out the impact of incomplete knowledge on this issue. This not only deepens our understanding of the relationship between the randomness of the universe and the existence of life, but also provides new ideas for future theoretical development.