Abstract:Many scientists do not believe that Maxwell's fish eye mirror (MFEM) can provide perfect imaging even if there is a drain array around the imaging points. However, one microwave experiment found a case where a 0.2 lambda resolution could be achieved in an MFEM experiment [1]. In this paper, we show that the MFEM cannot resolve two imaging points at such a subwavelength resolution in most cases even in the presence of a drain array, and an extraordinary case of subwavelength imaging requires a particular phase difference between two coherent sources. Both numerical simulations and experimental results show that the phase difference of two subwavelength-distanced coherent sources greatly influences the field distribution around the drain array. In very few cases (when the phase difference of the two sources is chosen to be a very specific value), we might resolve the image points in the drain array under the assumption that the power absorbed by the scanning cable on the left side of the drain array should be symmetric to that on the right side of the drain array [1]. However, in most cases, we cannot obtain a super-resolution imaging, as other drains around the image points will greatly influence the imaging. We also note that the experiment assumed that the power absorbed by the scanning cable on the left and the right sides of the drain array is symmetric is not correct for the experiment reported in [1], as the drain array itself is not symmetric. The highly non-symmetric distribution of the absorbed power is also verified by our simulation and experimental results. The experimental "result" of resolving two image peaks could potentially be recovered using only a single image peak, which demonstrates the wrong assumption of mirror symmetry. Comparisons and comments on perfect passive drains, "super-resolution" in a spherical geodesic waveguide, and time reverse imaging are also given.

Subwavelength pulse focusing and perfect absorption in the Maxwell fisheye

Formation of Sub-Half-Wavelength Focal Spot with Ultra Long Depth of Focus

Subwavelength Drains Designed for Mirror-Closed Dielectric Lenses

Maxwell's fish-eye lens and its applications

Elastic wave imaging with Maxwell's fish-eye lens

Abruptly Focusing and Defocusing Needles of Light and Closed-Form Electromagnetic Wavepackets

Magnetically tunable Maxwell fisheye lens for spin waves focusing

On subwavelength imaging of Maxwell's fish eye lens

CAN MAXWELL'S FISH EYE LENS REALLY GIVE PERFECT IMAGING? PART III. A CAREFUL RECONSIDERATION OF THE ``EVIDENCE FOR SUBWAVELENGTH IMAGING WITH POSITIVE REFRACTION''

3-D Underwater Acoustic Wave Focusing by Periodic Structure

Can Maxwell's Fish Eye Lens Really Give Perfect Imaging? Part II. The case with drains

Maxwell'S Fish-Eye Lenses Under Schwartz-Christoffel Mappings

Optimal Diffractive Focusing of Quantum Waves

Perfect-Lens Theory Enables Metasurface Reflectors for Subwavelength Focusing

Coherent Perfect Absorber Makes a Perfect Drain for Maxwell's Fish-Eye Lens

Super-resolution Imaging Based on Modified Maxwell's Fish-Eye Lens

Quantum optics in Maxwell's fish eye lens with single atoms and photons

Can Maxwell'S Fish Eye Lens Really Give Perfect Imaging? Part Ii. the Case with Passive Drains

Solid Immersion Maxwell's Fish-Eye Lens Without Drain

Broadband Achromatic Flexural Wave Mikaelian Lens for High Resolution Focusing

A novel method for sub-wavelength focusing of flexural waves