Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration
Diego Paez,Yves Filion,Mario Castro-Gama,Claudia Quintiliani,Simone Santopietro,Chris Sweetapple,Fanlin Meng,Raziyeh Farmani,Guangtao Fu,David Butler,Qingzhou Zhang,Feifei Zheng,Kegong Diao,Bogumil Ulanicki,Yuan Huang,Jochen Deuerlein,Denis Gilbert,Edo Abraham,Olivier Piller,Alicja Balut,Rafal Brodziak,Jedrzej Bylka,Przemyslaw Zakrzewski,Yuanzhe Li,Jinliang Gao,Cai Jian,Chenhao Ou,Shiyuan Hu,Sophocles Sophocleous,Eirini Nikoloudi,Herman Mahmoud,Kevin Woodward,Michele Romano,Giovanni Francesco Santonastaso,Enrico Creaco,Armando Di Nardo,Michele Di Natale,Attila Bibok,Camilo Salcedo,Andres Aguilar,Paula Cuero,Sebastian Gonzalez,Sergio Munoz,Jorge Perez,Alejandra Posada,Juliana Robles,Kevin Vargas,Marco Franchini,Stefano Galelli,Joong Hoon Kim,Pedro Iglesias-Rey,Zoran Kapelan,Juan Saldarriaga,Dragan Savic,Thomas Walski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)wr.1943-5452.0001239
IF: 3.457
2020-01-01
Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Abstract:The paper presents the results of the Battle of Postdisaster Response and Restoration (BPDRR) presented in a special session at the first International water distribution systems analysis & computing and control in the water industry (WDSA/CCWI) Joint Conference, held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, in July 2018. The BPDRR problem focused on how to respond and restore water service after the occurrence of five earthquake scenarios that cause structural damage in a water distribution system. Participants were required to propose a prioritization schedule to fix the damages of each scenario while following restrictions on visibility/nonvisibility of damages. Each team/approach was evaluated against six performance criteria: (1) time without supply for hospital/firefighting, (2) rapidity of recovery, (3) resilience loss, (4) average time of no user service, (5) number of users without service for eight consecutive hours, and (6) water loss. Three main types of approaches were identified from the submissions: (1) general-purpose metaheuristic algorithms, (2) greedy algorithms, and (3) ranking-based prioritizations. All three approaches showed potential to solve the challenge efficiently. The results of the participants showed that for this network, the impact of a large-diameter pipe failure on the network is more significant than several smaller pipes failures. The location of isolation valves and the size of hydraulic segments influenced the resilience of the system during emergencies. On average, the interruptions to water supply (hospitals and firefighting) varied considerably among solutions and emergency scenarios, highlighting the importance of private water storage for emergencies. The effects of damages and repair work were more noticeable during the peak demand periods (morning and noontime) than during the low-flow periods; and tank storage helped to preserve functionality of the network in the first few hours after a simulated event. (C) 2020 American Society of Civil Engineers.