Sustaining high-solar-activity research

Albert Y. Shih,Amir Caspi,Jessie Duncan,Lindsay Glesener,Silvina E. Guidoni,Katharine K. Reeves

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/25c2cfeb.cea9011a

2023-06-21

Abstract:Research efforts that require observations of high solar activity, such as multiwavelength studies of large solar flares and CMEs, must contend with the 11-year solar cycle to a degree unparalleled by other segments of heliophysics. While the "fallow" years around each solar minimum can be a great time frame to build the next major solar observatory, the corresponding funding opportunity and any preceding technology developments would need to be strategically timed. Even then, it can be challenging for scientists on soft money to continue ongoing research efforts instead of switching to other, more consistent topics. The maximum of solar cycle 25 is particularly concerning due to the lack of a US-led major mission targeting high solar activity, which could result in significant attrition of expertise in the field. We recommend the development of a strategic program of missions and analysis that ensures optimal science return for each solar maximum while sustaining the research community between maxima.

Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics,Solar and Stellar Astrophysics,Plasma Physics,Space Physics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The paper primarily focuses on the issue of sustaining scientific research during periods of high solar activity, especially in the absence of major US-led observational missions in future solar activity cycles, and how to maintain and promote scientific development in the field of high solar activity research.

Specifically, the paper raises the following core issues:

1. **Funding and timing issues**: Due to the approximately 11-year cyclical variation of solar activity, researchers relying on soft funding (i.e., non-long-term stable funding) find it difficult to continue high solar activity-related research during solar activity minima. They may turn to other more stable research topics.

2. **Lack of observational missions**: We are currently facing a critical period as the maximum activity period of Solar Cycle 25 approaches, yet there are no major US-led missions targeting high solar activity during this period. This could lead to a loss of experts in the field and a decline in research capabilities.

3. **Impact of the end of the RHESSI mission**: The RHESSI (Reuven Ramaty High Energy Solar Spectroscopic Imager) mission provided stable support for the high solar activity research community for 14 years. However, with the end of its mission and no successor planned to operate during Solar Cycle 25, this poses uncertainty and potential threats to the community.

Based on the above issues, the paper suggests that NASA develop a strategic mission and analysis plan to ensure optimal scientific returns during each solar activity maximum period and to maintain the vitality of the research community during the solar activity cycle. This plan includes three aspects:

- **Timing selection**: At least one mission announcement needs to be strategically scheduled to coincide with the upcoming solar activity maximum period.
- **Coordinated cooperation**: Coordinate with other mission opportunities as much as possible to promote the achievement of system-level scientific goals.
- **Continuous support**: The clear goal is to maintain the health of the US research community related to high solar activity by allocating sufficient funds through various means, ensuring that soft-funded scientists can be reasonably retained between solar activity cycles.

By implementing the above strategies, resources can be utilized more effectively, reducing fatigue among community members, and maximizing scientific research outcomes during periods of high solar activity.