Abstract:The expression problem describes how most types can easily be extended with new ways to produce the type or new ways to consume the type, but not both. When abstract syntax trees are defined as an algebraic data type, for example, they can easily be extended with new consumers, such as print or eval, but adding a new constructor requires the modification of all existing pattern matches. The expression problem is one way to elucidate the difference between functional or data-oriented programs (easily extendable by new consumers) and object-oriented programs (easily extendable by new producers). This difference between programs which are extensible by new producers or new consumers also exists for dependently typed programming, but with one core difference: Dependently-typed programming almost exclusively follows the functional programming model and not the object-oriented model, which leaves an interesting space in the programming language landscape unexplored. In this paper, we explore the field of dependently-typed object-oriented programming by deriving it from first principles using the principle of duality. That is, we do not extend an existing object-oriented formalism with dependent types in an ad-hoc fashion, but instead start from a familiar data-oriented language and derive its dual fragment by the systematic use of defunctionalization and refunctionalization. Our central contribution is a dependently typed calculus which contains two dual language fragments. We provide type- and semantics-preserving transformations between these two language fragments: defunctionalization and refunctionalization. We have implemented this language and these transformations and use this implementation to explain the various ways in which constructions in dependently typed programming can be explained as special instances of the phenomenon of duality.

Towards an induction principle for nested data types

Relative induction principles for type theories

Structural Induction Principles for Functional Programmers

Refining Inductive Types

A topological reading of inductive and coinductive definitions in Dependent Type Theory

A Logic for Non-Monotone Inductive Definitions

Greatest HITs: Higher inductive types in coinductive definitions via induction under clocks

Generic Fibrational Induction

Analyzing Inductively Defined Properties for Recursive Data Structures

Definitional Functoriality for Dependent (Sub)Types -- Extended version

Multiple-inheritance hazards in dependently-typed algebraic hierarchies

Automated Induction for Complex Data Structures

Deriving Dependently-Typed OOP from First Principles -- Extended Version with Additional Appendices

Parametricity via Cohesion

Computational Higher Type Theory IV: Inductive Types

The Size-Change Principle for Mixed Inductive and Coinductive types

Dependent Types in Haskell: Theory and Practice

Flexible Coinduction in Agda

Coinductive control of inductive data types

Signatures and Induction Principles for Higher Inductive-Inductive Types

Abstraction Super-structuring Normal Forms: Towards a Theory of Structural Induction