A Shift In Artistic Practices through Artificial Intelligence

Kıvanç Tatar,Petter Ericson,Kelsey Cotton,Paola Torres Núñez del Prado,Roser Batlle-Roca,Beatriz Cabrero-Daniel,Sara Ljungblad,Georgios Diapoulis,Jabbar Hussain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/leon_a_02523
2024-04-10
Abstract:The explosion of content generated by artificial intelligence (AI) models has initiated a cultural shift in arts, music, and media, whereby roles are changing, values are shifting, and conventions are challenged. The vast, readily available dataset of the Internet has created an environment for AI models to be trained on any content on the Web. With AI models shared openly and used by many globally, how does this new paradigm shift challenge the status quo in artistic practices? What kind of changes will AI technology bring to music, arts, and new media?
Computers and Society,Artificial Intelligence,Multimedia
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper discusses how the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in artistic practice has triggered cultural changes, especially in the fields of art, music, and media. With the development of AI technology, artists can use open-source tools to generate images, music, and other content, which has changed the traditional way of artistic creation. However, this change also brings copyright, data ownership, and ethical issues. 1. **Content Generation and Copyright**: AI models use a large amount of data from the internet for training, sometimes disregarding the copyright and permission of creators. For example, content generated by tools like Stable Diffusion may be based on an artist's work without their consent. This has sparked discussions about artists' rights to their work being used in AI. 2. **Artistic Labor and Data**: AI tools require a large amount of data to generate high-fidelity content, leading to ethical issues regarding the replication, adaptation, and distribution of artworks and music on the internet. Artists' labor is transformed into data, which may be exploited by large tech companies, disregarding cultural backgrounds and creators' consent. 3. **Transformation of Artistic Practice**: AI tools have facilitated a shift from individual artists to collective creation, but power structures still remain concentrated in the hands of a few tech companies that provide and maintain AI development tools and computing resources. This affects the role of artists in society and cultural economy. 4. **Inclusivity and Diversity**: While AI technology has the potential to involve more people in artistic creation, it can also reinforce dominant cultures and marginalize minority groups. AI models may perpetuate stereotypes and biases, necessitating a focus on inclusive, unbiased, and diverse artistic expressions. 5. **Future Outlook**: The paper calls for ethical considerations in all aspects of data production, model design, etc., with the participation of artists and technologists in decision-making processes. Additionally, reforms in copyright laws, transparency, regulation, and accountability are needed to address the challenges posed by AI technology. In summary, the paper aims to draw attention to the growing role of AI in artistic practice and the accompanying issues of copyright, ethics, and fairness, emphasizing the need to establish a more inclusive and sustainable future for art.