Abstract:Abstract Objective . To present an efficient uncertainty quantification method for range and set-up errors in Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations. Further, we show that uncertainty induced by interplay and other dynamic influences may be approximated using suitable error correlation models. Approach . We introduce an importance (re-)weighting method in MC history scoring to concurrently construct estimates for error scenarios, the expected dose and its variance from a single set of MC simulated particle histories. The approach relies on a multivariate Gaussian input and uncertainty model, which assigns probabilities to the initial phase space sample, enabling the use of different correlation models. Through modification of the phase space parameterization, accuracy can be traded between that of the uncertainty or the nominal dose estimate. Main results . The method was implemented using the MC code TOPAS and validated for proton intensity-modulated particle therapy (IMPT) with reference scenario estimates. We achieve accurate results for set-up uncertainties ( γ 2 mm/2% ≥ 99.01% ( E [ d ]), γ 2 mm/2% ≥ 98.04% ( σ ( d ))) and expectedly lower but still sufficient agreement for range uncertainties, which are approximated with uncertainty over the energy distribution. Here pass rates of 99.39% ( E [ d ])/ 93.70% ( σ ( d )) (range errors) and 99.86% ( E [ d ])/ 96.64% ( σ ( d )) (range and set-up errors) can be achieved. Initial evaluations on a water phantom, a prostate and a liver case from the public CORT dataset show that the CPU time decreases by more than an order of magnitude. Significance . The high precision and conformity of IMPT comes at the cost of susceptibility to treatment uncertainties in particle range and patient set-up. Yet, dose uncertainty quantification and mitigation, which is usually based on sampled error scenarios, becomes challenging when computing the dose with computationally expensive but accurate MC simulations. As the results indicate, the proposed method could reduce computational effort while also facilitating the use of high-dimensional uncertainty models.

Underestimating the uncertainty of aggregated results: the case of W-Boson mass

Uncertainty quantification of mass models using ensemble Bayesian model averaging

A minimalistic and general weighted averaging method for inconsistent data

Importance sampling method for Feldman-Cousins confidence intervals

Uncertainty evaluation and correlation analysis of single-particle energies in phenomenological nuclear mean field: an investigation into propagating uncertainties for independent model parameters

Bayesian inference of $W$-boson mass

Uncertainty components in profile likelihood fits

A critical study of the Monte Carlo replica method

Uncertainty evaluation and correlation analysis of single-particle energies in phenomenological nuclear mean field: An investigation of propagating uncertainties for independent model parameters

Undercoverage in high-statistics counting experiments with finite MC samples

An importance sampling method for Feldman-Cousins confidence intervals

Efficient uncertainty quantification for Monte Carlo dose calculations using importance (re-)weighting

Potential fitting biases resulting from grouping data into variable width bins

A Bayesian approach for parameter estimation and prediction using a computationally intensive model

Ensembles Are Required to Handle Aleatoric and Parametric Uncertainty in Molecular Dynamics Simulation

The Monte Carlo replica method: investigating the effects of non-linearity

Mesh-free Semi-Quantitative Variance Underestimation Elimination Method in Monte Caro Algorithm

Information divergences to parametrize astrophysical uncertainties in dark matter direct detection

Statistical Uncertainty Analysis for Stochastic Simulation

Capturing Random Error Terms in Monte Carlo Fission Source Distributions Using the Sw Distance Measure