Do Productivity Shocks Cause Inputs Misallocation?

Davide Luparello
2024-08-07
Abstract:Firms exhibit varying productivity levels even within narrowly defined industries and face uncertainty when predicting future performance. This paper investigates the link between productivity uncertainty, heterogeneity, and misallocation across all inputs. Using a model where heterogeneous firms face staggered productivity shocks, creating gaps between expected and actual productivity, I find a positive association between marginal revenue product dispersions and productivity variability. The analysis reveals that productivity shocks predominantly drive marginal revenue product dispersions. By comparing baseline estimates with those from the factor shares approach, I highlight the limitations of the latter method in analyzing the effects of productivity evolution.
General Economics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores the relationship between productivity uncertainty, heterogeneity, and misallocation of production inputs. The authors construct a theoretical model to analyze how productivity shocks affect the distribution of Marginal Revenue Product (MRP) and further examine how this impact varies across different types of production factors. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following core issues: 1. **The relationship between productivity shocks and the dispersion of Marginal Revenue Product**: The paper investigates how productivity uncertainty (particularly the difference between expected and actual productivity) leads to an increase in the dispersion of Marginal Revenue Product. This indicates that productivity shocks can significantly affect the differences in Marginal Revenue Product among different firms. 2. **The impact of the timing of productivity shocks on input allocation**: The authors distinguish between productivity shocks occurring at different times and analyze their varying impacts on firms' input decisions. They particularly focus on productivity shocks occurring before and after material input decisions. 3. **The link between productivity shocks and misallocation of inputs**: The paper explores how productivity shocks lead to misallocation of inputs and how this misallocation affects firms' economic performance. 4. **Comparing the effectiveness of two methods**: The paper compares the baseline model (based on the work of Gandhi, Navarro, and Rivers) with the Factor Share Approach (FS) in analyzing productivity evolution and its effects. The results reveal biases in the FS method when estimating certain parameters. Through the above analysis, the paper aims to reveal the impact of productivity uncertainty on firms' operational strategies and resource allocation efficiency. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the dynamic changes in productivity for accurately assessing the role of productivity shocks in misallocation of inputs. Additionally, the paper discusses ways policymakers can mitigate the negative impacts of productivity uncertainty.