Thermodynamic bound on quantum state discrimination

José Polo-Gómez
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.109.014119
2024-01-22
Abstract:We show that the second law of thermodynamics poses a restriction on how well we can discriminate between quantum states. By examining an ideal gas with a quantum internal degree of freedom undergoing a cycle based on a proposal by Asher Peres, we establish a non-trivial upper bound on the attainable accuracy of quantum state discrimination. This thermodynamic bound, which relies solely on the linearity of quantum mechanics and the constraint of no work extraction, matches Holevo's bound on accessible information, but is looser than the Holevo-Helstrom bound. The result gives more evidence on the disagreement between thermodynamic entropy and von Neumann entropy, and places potential limitations on proposals beyond quantum mechanics.
Quantum Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems Addressed by the Paper This paper attempts to explore the limitations imposed by the second law of thermodynamics on the ability to distinguish quantum states. Specifically, the authors demonstrate how thermodynamic principles can be used to derive an upper bound on quantum state discrimination by analyzing the behavior of an ideal gas in a specific cycle. This upper bound depends not only on the linear nature of quantum mechanics but also on the constraint of not being able to extract work. ### Main Contributions 1. **Establishing a Thermodynamic Upper Bound**: By introducing Peres' notion of a "magic membrane" that can perfectly distinguish two non-orthogonal quantum states, the authors show that such hypothetical devices would lead to violations of the second law of thermodynamics. Based on this, the authors propose a thermodynamic upper bound, which aligns with the Holevo bound on information accessibility but is more lenient than the Holevo-Helstrom bound. 2. **Limitations on Quantum State Discrimination**: The paper demonstrates the limitations imposed by the second law of thermodynamics on the ability to distinguish quantum states by analyzing the behavior of an ideal gas with quantum internal degrees of freedom in a specific cycle. This not only provides evidence for the differences between thermodynamic entropy and von Neumann entropy but also points to potential limitations beyond the framework of quantum mechanics. 3. **Comparing Different Upper Bounds**: The authors compare the thermodynamic upper bound with the Holevo-Helstrom bound in quantum information theory and find that the thermodynamic upper bound is more lenient in certain cases. This result suggests that if we go beyond the effective range of quantum mechanics, we might achieve higher discrimination capabilities, but this is not possible within the current framework of quantum mechanics. ### Conclusion The main conclusion of the paper is that the second law of thermodynamics imposes strict limitations on the ability to distinguish quantum states. Although these limitations are more lenient than those in quantum information theory, they provide a new perspective for understanding the thermodynamic constraints in quantum information processing and further emphasize the differences between thermodynamic entropy and von Neumann entropy.