Abstract:The quantum approximate optimization algorithm (QAOA) is a promising algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems (COPs). In this algorithm, there are alternating layers consisting of a mixer and a problem Hamiltonian. Each layer $i=0,\ldots,p-1$ is parameterized by $\beta_i$ and $\gamma_i$. How to find these parameters has been an open question with the majority of the research focused on finding them using classical algorithms. In this work, we present evidence that fixed linear ramp schedules constitute a universal set of QAOA parameters, i.e., a set of $\gamma$ and $\beta$ parameters that rapidly approximate the optimal solution, $x^*$, independently of the COP selected, and that the success probability of finding it, $probability(x^*)$, increases with the number of QAOA layers $p$. We simulate linear ramp QAOA protocols (LR-QAOA) involving up to $N_q=42$ qubits and $p = 400$ layers on random instances of 9 different COPs. The results suggest that $probability(x^*) \approx 1/2^{(\eta N_q / p)}$ for a constant $\eta$. For example, when implementing LR-QAOA with $p=42$, the $probability(x^*)$ for 42-qubit Weighted MaxCut problems (W-MaxCut) increases from $2/2^{42}\approx 10^{-13}$ to an average of 0.13. We compare LR-QAOA, simulated annealing (SA), and branch-and-bound (B\&B) finding a scaling improvement in LR-QAOA. We test LR-QAOA on real hardware using IonQ Aria, Quantinuum H2-1, IBM Brisbane, IBM Kyoto, and IBM Osaka, encoding random weighted MaxCut (W-MaxCut) problems from 5 to 109 qubits and $p=3$ to $100$. Even for the largest case, $N_q=109$ qubits and $p=100$, information about the LR-QAOA optimization protocol is present. The circuit involved requires 21200 CNOT gates. These results show that LR-QAOA effectively finds high-quality solutions for a large variety of COPs and suggest a scaling advantage of quantum computation for combinatorial optimization.

Multilevel leapfrogging initialization for quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Iterative Layerwise Training for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Recursive greedy initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with guaranteed improvement

Hybrid GRU-CNN Bilinear Parameters Initialization for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

Proactively incremental-learning QAOA

Parameters Fixing Strategy for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

An efficient quantum proactive incremental learning algorithm

Parameter optimization comparison in QAOA using Stochastic Hill Climbing with Random Re-starts and Local Search with entangled and non-entangled mixing operators

On high-order multilevel optimization strategies

Quantum annealing initialization of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm

Sequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms

Towards a universal QAOA protocol: Evidence of a scaling advantage in solving some combinatorial optimization problems

Multiscale Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm

An angle rounding parameter initialization technique for ma-QAOA

A Multilevel Approach For Solving Large-Scale QUBO Problems With Noisy Hybrid Quantum Approximate Optimization

Optimizing QAOA: Success Probability and Runtime Dependence on Circuit Depth

Training the Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm without access to a Quantum Processing Unit

Transfer learning of optimal QAOA parameters in combinatorial optimization

Linearly simplified QAOA parameters and transferability

Hybrid Heuristic Algorithms for Adiabatic Quantum Machine Learning Models