Abstract:figure legend Neural networks execute the transformation of inputs into the neural activity that enables the execution of a task. Thus, they have the potential to establish causal relationships between the input, the elements of a circuit, the network activity, and eventually behavior. When the purpose of building a model is to understand the mechanisms that enable behavior in biological circuits, the design of network models should be guided by three principles: (1) biological constraints are necessary (e.g., connectivity), (2) the network activity should match the recorded activity, and (3) the network should be able to perform the task of interest. Machine‐learning‐based training can help accomplish these goals. Due to the staggering complexity of the brain and its neural circuitry, neuroscientists rely on the analysis of mathematical models to elucidate its function. From Hodgkin and Huxley's detailed description of the action potential in 1952 to today, new theories and increasing computational power have opened up novel avenues to study how neural circuits implement the computations that underlie behavior. Computational neuroscientists have developed many models of neural circuits that differ in complexity, biological realism, or emergent network properties. With recent advances in experimental techniques for detailed anatomical reconstructions of large‐scale activity recordings, precise biological data has become more available. The challenge when building network models is to reflect experimental results, either through a high level of detail or by finding an appropriate level of abstraction. Meanwhile, machine learning has facilitated the development of artificial neural networks (ANN), which are trained to perform specific tasks. While they have proven successful at achieving task‐oriented behavior, they are often abstract constructs that differ in many features from the physiology of brain circuits. Thus, it is unclear whether the mechanisms underlying computation in biological circuits can be investigated by analyzing artificial networks that accomplish the same function but differ in their mechanisms. Here, we argue that building biologically realistic network models is crucial to establishing causal relationships between neurons, synapses, circuits, and behavior. More specifically, we advocate for network models that consider the connectivity structure and the recorded activity dynamics while evaluating task performance.

Neural Networks from Biological to Artificial and Vice Versa

Neural networks from biological to artificial and vice versa

Neural Networks, Artificial Intelligence and the Computational Brain

Recent Advances at the Interface of Neuroscience and Artificial Neural Networks

Interpretability of Neural Network With Physiological Mechanisms

Towards New Generation, Biologically Plausible Deep Neural Network Learning

Ablation Studies in Artificial Neural Networks

Neural Network Degeneration and its Relationship to the Brain

Rethinking Deep Learning: Non-backpropagation and Non-optimization Machine Learning Approach Using Hebbian Neural Networks

Brain-inspired learning in artificial neural networks: a review

A Study of Biologically Plausible Neural Network: The Role and Interactions of Brain-Inspired Mechanisms in Continual Learning

Analyzing biological and artificial neural networks: challenges with opportunities for synergy?

Neuronal Auditory Machine Intelligence (NEURO-AMI) In Perspective

Data Processing Using Artificial Neural Networks

The Role Of Biology In Deep Learning

Towards Brain Inspired Design for Addressing the Shortcomings of ANNs

Evaluations of artificial intelligence and machine learning in neurodiagnostics

Symbiosis of an artificial neural network and models of biological neurons: training and testing

A Novel Evaluation Strategy to Artificial Neural Network Model Based on Bionics

Grounding Neuroscience in Behavioral Changes using Artificial Neural Networks

How to incorporate biological insights into network models and why it matters