Abstract:Let $(M,\textit{g},\sigma)$ be an $m$-dimensional closed spin manifold, with a fixed Riemannian metric $\textit{g}$ and a fixed spin structure $\sigma$; let $\mathbb{S}(M)$ be the spinor bundle over $M$. The spinorial Yamabe-type problems address the solvability of the following equation \[ D_{\textit{g}}\psi = f(x)|\psi|_{\textit{g}}^{\frac2{m-1}}\psi, \quad \psi:M\to\mathbb{S}(M), \ x\in M \] where $D_{\textit{g}}$ is the associated Dirac operator and $f:M\to\mathbb{R}$ is a given function. The study of such nonlinear equation is motivated by its important applications in Spin Geometry: when $m=2$, a solution corresponds to a conformal isometric immersion of the universal covering $\widetilde M$ into $\mathbb{R}^3$ with prescribed mean curvature $f$; meanwhile, for general dimensions and $f\equiv constant\neq0$, a solution provides an upper bound estimate for the Bär-Hijazi-Lott invariant. The aim of this paper is to establish non-compactness results related to the spinorial Yamabe-type problems. Precisely, concrete analysis is made for two specific models on the manifold $(S^m,\textit{g})$ where the solution set of the spinorial Yamabe-type problem is not compact: $1).$ the geometric potential $f$ is constant (say $f\equiv1$) with the background metric $\textit{g}$ being a $C^k$ perturbation of the canonical round metric $\textit{g}_{S^m}$, which is not conformally flat somewhere on $S^m$; $2).$ $f$ is a perturbation from constant and is of class $C^2$, while the background metric $\textit{g}\equiv\textit{g}_{S^m}$.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

### What problem does the paper attempt to solve? The paper aims to study the results of the spinorial Yamabe-type problem in the context of non-compactness. Specifically, it focuses on concrete models when the solution set is non-compact. #### Main Objectives: 1. **Establish non-compactness results**: The goal of the paper is to establish non-compactness results related to the spinorial Yamabe-type problem on spin manifolds. Specifically, for two particular models, it proves that the solution set is not compact. - Model 1: The geometric potential function $ f $ is a constant (e.g., $ f \equiv 1 $), the background metric $ g $ is a $ C^k $ perturbation of the standard round metric $ g_{S^m} $, and it is not conformally flat at some point on $ S^m $. - Model 2: $ f $ is a $ C^2 $ function perturbed from a constant, while the background metric $ g \equiv g_{S^m} $. 2. **Address strict inequality issues**: By constructing specific geometric data to prove strict inequalities. In particular, when $ f \equiv 1 $, by constructing a non-smooth metric $ g $, the strict inequality of the Bär-Hijazi-Lott invariant holds. 3. **Explore the impact of external potential functions**: Investigate the impact of non-constant functions $ f $ on the spinorial Yamabe-type problem under a fixed background metric $ g_{S^m} $. #### Specific Results: - **Theorem 1.2**: For a given dimension $ m \geq 4k+2 $, there exists a $ C^k $ metric $ g $ and a sequence of spinors $ \{\psi_i\}_{i=1}^\infty $ satisfying the following conditions: - $ g $ is not locally conformally flat. - $ \psi_i $ is a non-trivial solution of the equation $ D_g \psi = |\psi|^{\frac{2m}{m-1}}_g \psi $. - The integral of the solution $ \int_{S^m} |\psi_i|^{\frac{2m}{m-1}}_g \, d\text{vol}_g $ is strictly less than $ \left(\frac{m}{2}\right)^m \omega_m $. - $ \sup_{S^m} |\psi_i|_g \to +\infty $ as $ i \to \infty $. - **Theorem 1.4**: For any $ m \geq 2 $, there exists a non-constant function $ f \in C^2(S^m) $ and a sequence of spinors $ \{\psi_i\}_{i=1}^\infty $ satisfying the following conditions: - $ \psi_i $ is a non-trivial solution of the equation $ D_{g_{S^m}} \psi = f(x) |\psi|^{\frac{2m}{m-1}}_{g_{S^m}} \psi $. - The integral of the solution $ \int_{S^m} f(x) |\psi_i|^{\frac{2m}{m-1}}_{g_{S^m}} \, d\text{vol}_{g_{S^m}} $ approaches $ \left(\frac{m}{2}\right)^m \omega_m $. - $ \sup_{S^m} |\psi_i|_{g_{S^m}} \to +\infty $ as $ i \to \infty $. Through these results, the paper demonstrates the non-compactness of the solution set of the spinorial Yamabe-type problem under certain specific conditions and provides new perspectives for understanding this problem.

Non-compactness results for the spinorial Yamabe-type problems with non-smooth geometric data

The Yamabe Problem for Higher Order Curvatures

Solutions of Spinorial Yamabe-type Problems on $S^m$: Perturbations and Applications

0 50 54 63 v 1 2 3 M ay 2 00 5 THE YAMABE PROBLEM FOR HIGHER ORDER CURVATURES

Variational Structure of $\Boldsymbol{k}$-Yamabe Problem on Manifolds with Boundary

Thek-Yamabe Solitons and the Quotient Yamabe Solitons

Yamabe Invariants and Spin^c Structures

A Local Method for Compact and Non-compact Yamabe Problems

Spinorial Yamabe-type equations and the Bär-Hijazi-Lott invariant

On the Bär-Hijazi-Lott invariant for the Dirac operator and a spinorial proof of the Yamabe problem

$Spin^c$ Manifolds and Rigidity Theorems in $K$-Theory

The Yamabe problem with singularities

Fully nonlinear Yamabe-type problems on non-compact manifolds

Compact approach to the positivity of Brown-York mass and rigidity of manifolds with mean-convex boundaries in flat and spherical contexts

A non-compactness result on the fractional Yamabe problem in large dimensions

A Variational Approach to the Yamabe Problem: Conformal Transformations and Scalar Curvature on Compact Riemannian Manifolds

Compactness of Ar-spin equations

A singular Yamabe problem on manifolds with solid cones

A compactness theorem of the fractional Yamabe problem, Part I: The non-umbilic conformal infinity

On the Stability of Riemannian Manifold with Parallel Spinors

Non-compact manifolds with Killing spinors