Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

How Does Information Bottleneck Help Deep Learning?

On the information bottleneck theory of deep learning

Deep Learning and the Information Bottleneck Principle

Going Deeper, Generalizing Better: an Information-Theoretic View for Deep Learning.

Drill the Cork of Information Bottleneck by Inputting the Most Important Data

Elastic Information Bottleneck

Information Bottleneck: Theory and Applications in Deep Learning

A Critical Review of Information Bottleneck Theory and its Applications to Deep Learning

Information Bottleneck Theory on Convolutional Neural Networks

Information Bottleneck in Deep Learning - A Semiotic Approach

Tighter Bounds on the Information Bottleneck with Application to Deep Learning

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

On the Difference Between the Information Bottleneck and the Deep Information Bottleneck

Information Bottleneck Analysis of Deep Neural Networks via Lossy Compression

Justices for Information Bottleneck Theory

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

The Distributed Information Bottleneck reveals the explanatory structure of complex systems

Information bottleneck theory of high-dimensional regression: relevancy, efficiency and optimality

Layer-wise Learning of Stochastic Neural Networks with Information Bottleneck

PAC-Bayes Information Bottleneck

Understanding the Generalization Ability of Deep Learning Algorithms: A Kernelized Renyi's Entropy Perspective