Analysis of Perceived Stress Test using Machine Learning

Toygar Tanyel
2023-06-02
Abstract:The aim of this study is to determine the perceived stress levels of 150 individuals and analyze the responses given to adapted questions in Turkish using machine learning. The test consists of 14 questions, each scored on a scale of 0 to 4, resulting in a total score range of 0-56. Out of these questions, 7 are formulated in a negative context and scored accordingly, while the remaining 7 are formulated in a positive context and scored in reverse. The test is also designed to identify two sub-factors: perceived self-efficacy and stress/discomfort perception. The main objectives of this research are to demonstrate that test questions may not have equal importance using artificial intelligence techniques, reveal which questions exhibit variations in the society using machine learning, and ultimately demonstrate the existence of distinct patterns observed psychologically. This study provides a different perspective from the existing psychology literature by repeating the test through machine learning. Additionally, it questions the accuracy of the scale used to interpret the results of the perceived stress test and emphasizes the importance of considering differences in the prioritization of test questions. The findings of this study offer new insights into coping strategies and therapeutic approaches in dealing with stress. Source code: <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/toygarr/ppl-r-stressed" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>
Machine Learning,Human-Computer Interaction
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The main problem that this paper attempts to solve is to analyze and evaluate the perceived stress levels of 150 individuals through machine - learning methods, and to explore the importance of each question in the Turkish - version stress test questionnaire and its differences in society. Specifically, the study aims to: 1. **Verify the importance of test questions**: Use artificial intelligence technology to show that the questions in the test may not be of equal importance. 2. **Reveal social differences**: Use machine learning to reveal which questions show social - level differences when answered. 3. **Identify psychological patterns**: Ultimately show the significant patterns observed from a psychological perspective. 4. **Re - examine the accuracy of existing scales**: Question the accuracy of the scale used to interpret the results of the perceived stress test, and emphasize that the differences in the importance of test questions should not be ignored. 5. **Provide new perspectives**: Provide new insights into stress - coping strategies and treatment methods. ### Main Objectives - **Show inconsistent importance of questions**: Prove through machine - learning methods that different questions have different degrees of influence on stress levels. - **Reveal social differences**: Determine which questions show social - level differences when answered. - **Show psychological patterns**: By analyzing test results, reveal the significant patterns observed psychologically. - **Re - evaluate existing scales**: Question whether the existing perceived stress scale is accurate, and emphasize that the differences in the importance and priority of test questions should be considered. ### Methods The study used machine - learning models (such as XGBoost, Random Forest, Decision Tree, etc.) to analyze the response data of 150 individuals. Each question was scored and divided into two sub - factors: perceived self - efficacy (Factor I) and stress / discomfort (Factor II). Through these models, researchers were able to evaluate the impact of each question on the overall stress level and determine which questions showed significant differences among different populations. ### Results The research results show that some questions (such as Q2, Q6, Q9, and Q14) are considered very important for model prediction, while other questions (such as Q5, Q10, Q12, and Q13) are considered relatively unimportant. This indicates that different questions have different contributions when measuring stress levels, thus supporting the core hypothesis of this study, that is, not all questions are of the same importance. ### Significance This study not only provides a new perspective for understanding the effectiveness of stress tests, but also lays the foundation for the development of more accurate stress assessment tools. In addition, it also emphasizes the importance of considering the differences in the importance of questions when designing and interpreting psychological tests.