Abstract:The emergence of the metaverse is being widely viewed as a revolutionary technology owing to a myriad of factors, particularly the potential to increase the accessibility of learning for students with disabilities. However, not much is yet known about the views and expectations of disabled students in this regard. The fact that the metaverse is still in its nascent stage exemplifies the need for such timely discourse. To bridge this important gap, we conducted a series of semi-structured interviews with 56 university students with disabilities in the United States and Hong Kong to understand their views and expectations concerning the future of metaverse-driven education. We have distilled student expectations into five thematic categories, referred to as the REEPS framework: Recognition, Empowerment, Engagement, Privacy, and Safety. Additionally, we have summarized the main design considerations in eight concise points. This paper is aimed at helping technology developers and policymakers plan ahead of time and improving the experiences of students with disabilities.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Aims to Address
This paper aims to explore the perspectives and expectations of disabled students regarding the future of metaverse-driven education. Specifically, the research team conducted a series of semi-structured interviews to investigate the views of 56 disabled university students from the United States and Hong Kong, in order to understand their needs and expectations in metaverse education. The main objectives of the paper are:
1. **Filling the Research Gap**: Currently, there is limited research on the perspectives and expectations of disabled students regarding metaverse education. This paper attempts to fill this gap.
2. **Proposing the REEPS Framework**: By analyzing the interview data, the research team proposed a framework consisting of five thematic categories—REEPS (Recognition, Empowerment, Engagement, Privacy, and Safety)—to guide technology developers and policymakers in considering these key factors when designing metaverse education.
3. **Providing Design Recommendations**: The paper summarizes eight specific design considerations to help technology developers and policymakers plan ahead and improve the educational experience for disabled students.
### Main Findings
1. **Student Impressions**:
- The majority of students (71%) are optimistic about the educational opportunities brought by the metaverse, believing it can bridge the current educational gap between disabled and non-disabled students.
- Some students (21%) are concerned about being forgotten and deprived of educational rights, as well as issues such as virtual teachers replacing real teachers, resource inequality, isolation, privacy, and safety.
- A minority of students (8%) hold a neutral attitude towards the metaverse, believing it may not bring fundamental changes.
2. **REEPS Framework**:
- **Recognition**: Students want technology companies to recognize the importance of disability inclusion and adaptability, rather than treating it as a secondary matter.
- **Empowerment**: Students hope to have more opportunities for autonomous learning and customized experiences in the metaverse, becoming creators and equal contributors rather than just passive users.
- **Engagement**: The metaverse should provide immersive, active, and socially connected learning environments that promote active participation and barrier-free interaction with teachers and peers.
- **Privacy**: Students demand control over their data and identity, with personal information disclosure being user-determined to ensure comfort and safety.
- **Safety**: The metaverse should prioritize safety on multiple levels, including physical environments, physical devices, virtual environments, and virtual applications. The research shows that many students need a metaverse education environment that does not tolerate disability-based harassment and abuse.
3. **Design Considerations**:
- **Recognize and Challenge Disability Misconceptions**: Educate oneself about various disabilities.
- **Consider Non-Visible Disabilities**: Such as autism.
- **Collect Diverse Feedback**: Gather opinions from people of different backgrounds.
- **Design Affordable and Safe Solutions**.
- **Support Assistive Technologies**: In both physical and virtual worlds.
- **Apply Universal Design Principles**: Allow customization and future plugins.
- **Promote Collaboration Among Students, Teachers, Peers, and Caregivers**.
- **Continuous Evaluation and Improvement**: Ensure the needs of disabled students are met through an iterative process.
### Conclusion
The paper emphasizes that inclusive and accessible metaverse education can only be achieved when technology designers and developers recognize the establishment of REEPS qualities as a societal necessity, rather than an afterthought or a benevolent act. The research also points out the existence of an "accessibility stalemate" between technology developers and higher education institutions, where both parties are unclear about who is responsible for providing certain accessibility features, leading to inaction. It is hoped that this paper will prompt technology designers to prioritize accessibility and meet the diverse needs of disabled students in metaverse education.