Abstract:This paper evaluates market equilibrium under different pricing mechanisms in a two-settlement 100%-renewables electricity market. Given general probability distributions of renewable energy, we establish game-theoretical models to analyze equilibrium bidding strategies, market prices, and profits under uniform pricing (UP) and pay-as-bid pricing (PAB). We prove that UP can incentivize suppliers to withhold bidding quantities and lead to price spikes. PAB can reduce the market price, but it may lead to a mixed-strategy price equilibrium. Then, we present a regulated uniform pricing scheme (RUP) based on suppliers' marginal costs that include penalty costs for real-time deviations. We show that RUP can achieve lower yet positive prices and profits compared with PAB in a duopoly market, which approximates the least-cost system outcome. Simulations with synthetic and real data find that under PAB and RUP, higher uncertainty of renewables and real-time shortage penalty prices can increase the market price by encouraging lower bidding quantities, thereby increasing suppliers' profits.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to solve the market equilibrium problem under different pricing mechanisms in the 100% renewable energy electricity market. Specifically, by establishing a game - theory model, the author analyzes the bidding strategies of suppliers, market prices and profits under two pricing mechanisms, namely Uniform Pricing (UP) and Pay as Bid (PAB). The main research questions of the paper include:
1. **Problems with the Uniform Pricing mechanism (UP)**:
- The Uniform Pricing mechanism may lead suppliers to deliberately under - report power generation in order to raise the market price, resulting in a price spike.
- Since the marginal cost of renewable energy (such as wind and solar energy) is almost zero, if suppliers bid according to the real marginal cost, it may lead to low and highly volatile prices in the day - ahead market.
2. **Advantages and problems of the Pay - as - Bid mechanism (PAB)**:
- The Pay - as - Bid mechanism can reduce the average market price and revenue by introducing price competition, which is beneficial to consumers.
- However, the PAB mechanism may not reveal the true marginal cost of suppliers, resulting in low market efficiency. In addition, the market price under the PAB mechanism is difficult to predict and regulate.
3. **Proposing a new Regulated Uniform Pricing mechanism (RUP)**:
- The author proposes a Regulated Uniform Pricing mechanism (RUP) based on the marginal cost of suppliers (including real - time deviation penalty cost), aiming to achieve lower but still positive market prices and profits.
- Through theoretical analysis and simulation, the RUP mechanism can achieve lower market prices and profits than PAB in a duopoly market, approaching the results of the lowest - cost system.
### Main contributions
1. **Nash equilibrium analysis**:
- Analyzes the strategic behavior of suppliers in a two - settlement market with renewable energy, taking into account day - ahead revenue and real - time shortage penalty costs.
- Establishes a game - theory framework to describe the Nash equilibrium of bidding prices and quantities of suppliers under UP and PAB mechanisms, and analyzes the equilibrium market prices and profits.
2. **Comparison of market mechanisms**:
- Compares the equilibrium prices and profits under UP and PAB mechanisms, and proves that under the UP mechanism, suppliers can exercise market power to cause price spikes, while under the PAB mechanism, although the market price can be reduced, there is no pure - strategy equilibrium.
- Proposes the RUP mechanism as a potential regulatory benchmark for renewable energy, which can achieve lower but still positive market prices and profits under duopoly competition.
3. **Simulation results**:
- Conducts simulations using synthetic and real data, and the results show that the RUP mechanism can achieve the lowest market prices and profits.
- Finds that an increase in the uncertainty of renewable energy and an increase in the real - time shortage penalty price will both increase the market price by encouraging conservative bidding quantities, thereby increasing the profits of suppliers.
### Conclusion
Through the game - theory analysis of different pricing mechanisms in the 100% renewable energy electricity market, the paper reveals the advantages and disadvantages of the Uniform Pricing mechanism and the Pay - as - Bid mechanism, and proposes a new Regulated Uniform Pricing mechanism (RUP) aiming to achieve more efficient and fair market results. Future research will further generalize the assumptions, considering elastic demand, a comprehensive analysis of real - time deviation prices, and the correlation between the random generation of suppliers.