Lankeswar Dey,Maura A. McLaughlin,Haley M. Wahl,Paul B. Demorest,Zaven Arzoumanian,Harsha Blumer,Paul R. Brook,Sarah Burke-Spolaor,H. Thankful Cromartie,Megan E. DeCesar,Timothy Dolch,Justin A. Ellis,Robert D. Ferdman,Elizabeth C. Ferrara,William Fiore,Emmanuel Fonseca,Nate Garver-Daniels,Peter A. Gentile,Joseph Glaser,Deborah C. Good,Ross J. Jennings,Megan L. Jones,Michael T. Lam,Duncan R. Lorimer,Jing Luo,Ryan S. Lynch,Cherry Ng,David J. Nice,Timothy T. Pennucci,Nihan S. Pol,Scott M. Ransom,Renée Spiewak,Ingrid H. Stairs,Kevin Stovall,Joseph K. Swiggum

Abstract:Pulsar timing array experiments have recently uncovered evidence for a nanohertz gravitational wave background by precisely timing an ensemble of millisecond pulsars. The next significant milestones for these experiments include characterizing the detected background with greater precision, identifying its source(s), and detecting continuous gravitational waves from individual supermassive black hole binaries. To achieve these objectives, generating accurate and precise times of arrival of pulses from pulsar observations is crucial. Incorrect polarization calibration of the observed pulsar profiles may introduce errors in the measured times of arrival. Further, previous studies (e.g., van Straten 2013; Manchester et al. 2013) have demonstrated that robust polarization calibration of pulsar profiles can reduce noise in the pulsar timing data and improve timing solutions. In this paper, we investigate and compare the impact of different polarization calibration methods on pulsar timing precision using three distinct calibration techniques: the Ideal Feed Assumption (IFA), Measurement Equation Modeling (MEM), and Measurement Equation Template Matching (METM). Three NANOGrav pulsars-PSRs J1643$-$1224, J1744$-$1134, and J1909$-$3744-observed with the 800 MHz and 1.5 GHz receivers at the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) are utilized for our analysis. Our findings reveal that all three calibration methods enhance timing precision compared to scenarios where no polarization calibration is performed. Additionally, among the three calibration methods, the IFA approach generally provides the best results for timing analysis of pulsars observed with the GBT receiver system. We attribute the comparatively poorer performance of the MEM and METM methods to potential instabilities in the reference noise diode coupled to the receiver and temporal variations in the profile of the reference pulsar, respectively.

Exploring the Capabilities of Gibbs Sampling in Pulsar Timing Arrays

The Need For Speed: Rapid Refitting Techniques for Bayesian Spectral Characterization of the Gravitational Wave Background Using PTAs

A Trans-dimensional Bayesian Approach to Pulsar Timing Noise Analysis

Solving the PTA Data Analysis Problem with a Global Gibbs Scheme

Efficient Bayesian inference and model selection for continuous gravitational waves in pulsar timing array data

The NANOGrav 15 year Data Set: Removing pulsars one by one from the pulsar timing array

The NANOGrav 15 yr data set: Posterior predictive checks for gravitational-wave detection with pulsar timing arrays

Efficient Bayesian inference and model selection for continuous waves in pulsar timing array data

A Bayesian parameter estimation approach to pulsar time-of-arrival analysis

The NANOGrav 11-year Data Set: High-precision Timing of 45 Millisecond Pulsars

Timing Gamma-ray Pulsars with the Fermi Large Area Telescope: Timing Noise and Astrometry

The NANOGrav 15-Year Data Set: Detector Characterization and Noise Budget

Impact of quasi-periodic and steep-spectrum timing noise on the measurement of pulsar timing parameters

Modeling non stationary noise in pulsar timing array data analysis

Fast Parameter Inference on Pulsar Timing Arrays with Normalizing Flows

The NANOGrav 15 yr Data Set: Chromatic Gaussian Process Noise Models for Six Pulsars

Improving pulsar-timing solutions through dynamic pulse fitting

Noise in pulsar timing arrays

Exploring pulsar timing precision: A comparative study of polarization calibration methods for NANOGrav data from the Green Bank Telescope