Abstract:Reports of Russian interference in U.S. elections have raised grave concerns about the spread of foreign disinformation on social media sites, but there is little detailed analysis that links traditional political communication theory to social media analytics. As a result, it is difficult for researchers and analysts to gauge the nature or level of the threat that is disseminated via social media. This paper leverages both social science and data science by using traditional content analysis and Twitter analytics to trace how key aspects of Russian strategic narratives were distributed via #skripal, #mh17, #Donetsk, and #russophobia in late 2018. This work will define how key Russian international communicative goals are expressed through strategic narratives, describe how to find hashtags that reflect those narratives, and analyze user activity around the hashtags. This tests both how Twitter amplifies specific information goals of the Russians as well as the relative success (or failure) of particular hashtags to spread those messages effectively. This research uses Mentionmapp, a system co-developed by one of the authors (Gray) that employs network analytics and machine intelligence to identify the behavior of Twitter users as well as generate profiles of users via posting history and connections. This study demonstrates how political communication theory can be used to frame the study of social media; how to relate knowledge of Russian strategic priorities to labels on social media such as Twitter hashtags; and to test this approach by examining a set of Russian propaganda narratives as they are represented by hashtags. Our research finds that some Twitter users are consistently active across multiple Kremlin-linked hashtags, suggesting that knowledge of these hashtags is an important way to identify Russian propaganda online influencers. More broadly, we suggest that Twitter dichotomies such as bot/human or troll/citizen should be used with caution and analysis should instead address the nuances in Twitter use that reflect varying levels of engagement or even awareness in spreading foreign disinformation online.

Socio-Linguistic Characteristics of Coordinated Inauthentic Accounts

Disinformation and Social Bot Operations in the Run Up to the 2017 French Presidential Election

Investigating Coordinated 'Social' Targeting of High-Profile Twitter Accounts

Multifaceted online coordinated behavior in the 2020 US presidential election

Exposing Cross-Platform Coordinated Inauthentic Activity in the Run-Up to the 2024 U.S. Election

The Spread of Propaganda by Coordinated Communities on Social Media

Uncovering Coordinated Cross-Platform Information Operations Threatening the Integrity of the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election Online Discussion

Coordinated Behavior on Social Media in 2019 UK General Election

Who Falls for Online Political Manipulation?

Analyzing the Digital Traces of Political Manipulation: The 2016 Russian Interference Twitter Campaign

Coordinated Information Campaigns on Social Media: A Multifaceted Framework for Detection and Analysis

Unmasking information manipulation: A quantitative approach to detecting Copy-pasta, Rewording, and Translation on Social Media

Large Language Models Reveal Information Operation Goals, Tactics, and Narrative Frames

Identifying Coordinated Accounts on Social Media through Hidden Influence and Group Behaviours

Keeping it Authentic: The Social Footprint of the Trolls Network

SCG: Spotting Coordinated Groups in Social Media

Challenges and Opportunities in Information Manipulation Detection: An Examination of Wartime Russian Media

Characterizing the 2016 Russian IRA Influence Campaign

Use of Facebook Accounts with Inauthentic Behavior in Elections: The Romanian Presidential Election Case

#Kremlin: Using Hashtags to Analyze Russian Disinformation Strategy and Dissemination on Twitter

Multi-Modal Embeddings for Isolating Cross-Platform Coordinated Information Campaigns on Social Media