A note on an application of discrete Morse theoretic techniques on the complex of disconnected graphs

Anupam Mondal,Pritam Chandra Pramanik
2023-05-14
Abstract:Robin Forman's highly influential 2002 paper titled A User's Guide to Discrete Morse Theory presents an overview of the subject in a very readable manner. As a proof of concept, the author determines the topology (homotopy type) of the abstract simplicial complex of disconnected graphs of order $n$ (which was previously done by Victor Vassiliev using classical topological methods) using discrete Morse theoretic techniques, which are purely combinatorial in nature. The techniques involve the construction (and verification) of a discrete gradient vector field on the complex. However, the verification part relies on a claim that doesn't seem to hold. In this note, we provide a couple of counterexamples against this specific claim and also an alternative proof of the claim that the constructed discrete vector field is indeed a gradient vector field.
Combinatorics,Algebraic Topology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to verify and correct the validity of a specific assertion put forward by Robin Forman in his 2002 paper "A User's Guide to Discrete Morse Theory". Specifically, in the paper, Forman uses discrete Morse theory techniques to determine the homotopy type of the non - connected graph abstract simplicial complex \(N_n\) of order \(n\), a result previously proven by Victor Vassiliev through classical topological methods. Forman's method involves constructing (and verifying) a discrete gradient vector field \(V\) on the complex \(N_n\). However, in the process of verifying that the constructed discrete vector field \(V\) is indeed a gradient vector field, Forman relies on an assertion that seems not to hold. The author of this paper provides several counter - examples to prove the invalidity of this assertion, and also provides an alternative proof to show that the constructed discrete vector field \(V\) is indeed a gradient vector field. In short, the main objectives of this paper are: 1. Provide counter - examples to the specific assertion put forward by Forman. 2. Provide a valid alternative proof for the assertion that the constructed discrete vector field \(V\) is indeed a gradient vector field.