Kalel L. Rossi,Roberto C. Budzinski,Everton S. Medeiros,Bruno R. R. Boaretto,Lyle Muller,Ulrike Feudel
Abstract:Metastability, characterized by a variability of regimes in time, is a ubiquitous type of neural dynamics. It has been formulated in many different ways in the neuroscience literature, however, which may cause some confusion. In this Perspective, we discuss metastability from the point of view of dynamical systems theory. We extract from the literature a very simple but general definition through the concept of metastable regimes as long-lived but transient epochs of activity with unique dynamical properties. This definition serves as an umbrella term that encompasses formulations from other works, and readily connects to concepts from dynamical systems theory. This allows us to examine general dynamical properties of metastable regimes, propose in a didactic manner several dynamics-based mechanisms that generate them, and discuss a theoretical tool to characterize them quantitatively. This perspective leads to insights that help to address issues debated in the literature and also suggest pathways for future research.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to solve the confusion in the definition and mechanism of the concept of **metastability** in neuroscience. Specifically, the authors hope to:
1. **Provide a unified and general definition of metastability**: In neuroscience research, metastability has been expressed in many different ways, which may lead to some confusion. Therefore, the authors attempt to propose a simple but general definition from the perspective of dynamical systems theory, that is, **metastability is a long - existing but short - lived period of activity with unique dynamical characteristics**.
2. **Explain the dynamical mechanism of metastability**: Through dynamical systems theory, the authors explore several dynamics - based mechanisms that can generate metastability. In this way, they hope to provide a new perspective for understanding the metastability phenomenon in the brain and propose directions for future research.
3. **Connect concepts in different fields**: The authors hope to connect the metastability phenomenon in neuroscience with related concepts in physics and dynamical systems theory, thus providing a bridge for interdisciplinary research. For example, they connect metastable regions with almost - invariant regions in state space.
4. **Propose quantitative analysis tools**: In order to better understand and characterize metastability, the authors discuss some theoretical tools, such as the concept of almost - invariant regions, and how to identify these regions through optimization methods.
5. **Solve disputes in the literature**: Through a comprehensive analysis of the existing literature, the authors hope to clarify some disputes about the metastability mechanism and provide hypotheses for future experimental verification.
### Key formulas and concepts
- **Almost - Invariant Regions**:
- In state space, an almost - invariant region refers to a region where the probability that a trajectory stays in it is relatively high. Formally, if a region \(R\) satisfies the following condition, then it is almost invariant:
\[
P(s(t)\in R|s(0)\in R)\approx 1\quad\text{for a long time}
\]
- where \(s(t)\) represents the state of the system, \(t\) is time, and \(P\) is probability.
- **Attractor Hopping**:
- In a multistable system, noise can make the trajectory jump between different attractors. This phenomenon is called attractor hopping. Mathematically, it can be represented by the following formula:
\[
x(t) = f(x(t),\eta(t))
\]
- where \(x(t)\) is the state variable of the system, \(f\) is the dynamical function, and \(\eta(t)\) is the noise term.
### Summary
Through the above efforts, the authors hope to provide a clearer and more unified understanding framework for the metastability phenomenon in neuroscience and provide theoretical basis and technical tools for further research.