Abstract:Forward amplitude analyses constitute an important approach in the investigation of the energy dependence of the total hadronic cross-section [Formula: see text] and the [Formula: see text] parameter. The standard picture indicates for [Formula: see text] a leading log-squared dependence at the highest c.m. energies, in accordance with the Froissart–Lukaszuk–Martin bound and as predicted by the COMPETE Collaboration in 2002. Beyond this log-squared (L2) leading dependence, other amplitude analyses have considered a log-raised-to-gamma form [Formula: see text], with [Formula: see text] as a real free fit parameter. In this case, analytic connections with [Formula: see text] can be obtained either through dispersion relations (derivative forms), or asymptotic uniqueness (Phragmén–Lindelöff theorems). In this work, we present a detailed discussion on the similarities and mainly the differences between the Derivative Dispersion Relation (DDR) and Asymptotic Uniqueness (AU) approaches and results, with focus on the [Formula: see text] and L2 leading terms. We also develop new Regge–Gribov fits with updated dataset on [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] from [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] scattering, including all available data in the region 5 GeV–8 TeV. The recent tension between the TOTEM and ATLAS results at 7 TeV and mainly at 8 TeV is discussed and considered in the data reductions. Our main conclusions are the following: (1) all fit results present agreement with the experimental data analyzed and the goodness-of-fit is slightly better in case of the DDR approach; (2) by considering only the TOTEM data at the LHC region, the fits with L[Formula: see text] indicate [Formula: see text] (AU approach) and [Formula: see text] (DDR approach); (3) by including the ATLAS data the fits provide [Formula: see text] (AU) and [Formula: see text] (DDR); (4) in the formal and practical contexts, the DDR approach is more adequate for the energy interval investigated than the AU approach. A pedagogical and detailed review on the analytic results for [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] from the Regge–Gribov, DDR and AU approaches is presented. Formal and practical aspects related to forward amplitude analyses are also critically discussed.

Impact of the $f$-Reggeon exchanges on the observables of the single diffractive dissociation of nucleon at ultrahigh energies

Impact of the f-Reggeon exchanges on the observables of the single diffractive dissociation of nucleon at ultrahigh energies

Regge models of proton diffractive dissociation based on factorization and structure functions

Anomalous Dimensions from Soft Regge Constants

Dip-Bump Structure in Proton's Single Diffractive Dissociation at the Large Hadron Collider

Relations Between Anomalous Dimensions in the Regge Limit

Extracting the partonic structure of colorless exchanges at the Electron Ion Collider

Adding subtractions: comparing the impact of different Regge behaviors

Diffractive Electromagnetic Processes from a Regge Point of View

Regge trajectories for the doubly heavy diquarks

Drell-Yan diffraction: breakdown of QCD factorisation

Pomeron and Reggeon contributions to elastic proton-proton and proton-antiproton scattering in holographic QCD

Elastic pion-proton and pion-pion scattering via the holographic Pomeron and Reggeon exchange

Leading components in forward elastic hadron scattering: Derivative dispersion relations and asymptotic uniqueness

Diffractive cross sections and event final states at the LHC

A collinear perspective on the Regge limit

Deep Inelastic Scattering in Conformal QCD

Revisiting gauge invariance and Reggeization of pion exchange

One-loop impact factors for heavy quarkonium production: $S$-wave case