Rationally Querying the Reals

James Taylor

2023-05-01

Abstract:A new definition of a real number is that it is a rule which says Yes or No based on whether the real number ought to be in a given rational interval. This is a teaser paper for formalizing, exploring, and generalizing this definition. The full exploration is given in the paper "Defining Real Numbers as Oracles".

General Mathematics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Defining Real Numbers as Oracles

James Taylor

2023-05-17

Abstract:A real number is a rule that, when provided with a rational interval, answers Yes or No depending on if the real number ought to be considered to be in the given interval. Since the goal is to define the real numbers, this can only motivate the definition of which rules should be considered a real number. The rule must satisfy five properties and any rule that does so we call an oracle. Three of the properties ensure that we do not have multiple oracles representing the same real number. The other two properties ensure that the oracle does narrow down to a single real number. The most important property is the Separating property which ensures that if we divide a Yes interval into two parts, then one part is a Yes interval while the other is a No interval; the exception is if the division point, which is a rational number, happens to be the desired real number in which case both intervals are Yes intervals. We explore various examples and algorithms in using oracles in addition to establishing that the oracles do, in fact, form the field of real numbers. The concept of a Family of Overlapping, Notionally Shrinking Intervals is defined and found to be an essential tool in working with oracle arithmetic. Mediant approximations, which are related to continued fraction representations, naturally arise from an oracle perspective. We also compare and contrast with other common definitions of real numbers, such as Cauchy sequences and Dedekind cuts, in which the conclusion is that the oracle perspective is somewhat of a master map to the other definitions. We do an explicit example to contrast oracle arithmetic with decimal arithmetic and continued fraction arithmetic.

General Mathematics
Formalising Real Numbers in Homotopy Type Theory

Gaëtan Gilbert

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3018610.3018614

2016-10-18

Abstract:Cauchy reals can be defined as a quotient of Cauchy sequences of rationals. The limit of a Cauchy sequence of Cauchy reals is defined through lifting it to a sequence of Cauchy sequences of rationals. This lifting requires the axiom of countable choice or excluded middle, neither of which is available in homotopy type theory. To address this, the Univalent Foundations Program uses a higher inductive-inductive type to define the Cauchy reals as the free Cauchy complete metric space generated by the rationals. We generalize this construction to define the free Cauchy complete metric space generated by an arbitrary metric space. This forms a monad in the category of metric spaces with Lipschitz functions. When applied to the rationals it defines the Cauchy reals. Finally, we can use Altenkirch and Danielson (2016)'s partiality monad to define a semi-decision procedure comparing a real number and a rational number. The entire construction has been formalized in the Coq proof assistant. It is available at <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://github.com/SkySkimmer/HoTTClasses/tree/CPP2017" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a> .

Logic in Computer Science
Defining Integers

Alexandra Shlapentokh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1008.0809

2010-08-05

Abstract:We survey the recent developments in the area that grew out of attempts to extend an analog of Hilbert's Tenth Problem to the field of rational numbers and rings of integers of number fields. The paper is based on a plenary talk the author gave at the North American Annual ASL meeting at the University of Notre Dame in May of 2009.

Logic,Number Theory
On Quantifiers for Quantitative Reasoning

Matteo Capucci

2024-07-03

Abstract:We explore a kind of first-order predicate logic with intended semantics in the reals. Compared to other approaches in the literature, we work predominantly in the multiplicative reals $[0,\infty]$, showing they support three generations of connectives, that we call non-linear, linear additive, and linear multiplicative. Means and harmonic means emerge as natural candidates for bounded existential and universal quantifiers, and in fact we see they behave as expected in relation to the other logical connectives. We explain this fact through the well-known fact that min/max and arithmetic mean/harmonic mean sit at opposite ends of a spectrum, that of p-means. We give syntax and semantics for this quantitative predicate logic, and as example applications, we show how softmax is the quantitative semantics of argmax, and Rényi entropy/Hill numbers are additive/multiplicative semantics of the same formula. Indeed, the additive reals also fit into the story by exploiting the Napierian duality $-\log \dashv 1/\exp$, which highlights a formal distinction between 'additive' and 'multiplicative' quantities. Finally, we describe two attempts at a categorical semantics via enriched hyperdoctrines. We discuss why hyperdoctrines are in fact probably inadequate for this kind of logic.

Logic,Logic in Computer Science
Recursively enumerable reals and Chaitin numbers

C. S. Calude,P. H. Hertling,B. Khoussainov,Y. Wang

2001-01-01

Abstract:Abstract A real � is called recursivelyenumerable if it is the limit of a recursive, increasing, converg- ing sequence of rationals. Following Solovay(unpublished manuscript, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, May1975, 215 pp.) and Chaitin (IBM J. Res. Develop. 21 (1977) 350–359, 496.) we saythat an r.e. real � dominates an r.e. real � if from a good approximation of � from below one can compute a good approximation of � from below. We shall studythis relation and characterize it in terms of relations between r.e. sets. Solo- vay’s (unpublished manuscript, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, May1975, 215 pp.) � -like numbers are the maximal r.e. real numbers with respect to this order. Theyare random r.e. real numbers. The halting probabilityof a universal self- delimiting Turing machine (Chaitin’s � number (J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 22 (1975) 329–340)) is also a random r.e. real. Solovayshowed that anyChaitin � number is � -like. In this paper we show that the converse implication is true as well: any � -like real in the unit interval is the halting probabilityof a universal self-delimiting Turing machine. c 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
Series Recursively Enumerable Reals and Chaitin Numbers

Cristian S. Calude,Peter H. Hertling,Bakhadyr Khoussainov,Yongge Wang

1997-01-01

Abstract:A real is called recursively enumerable if it can be approximated by an increasing, recursive sequence of rationals. The halting probability of a universal selfdelimiting Turing machine (Chaitin's number, [10]) is a random r.e. real. Solovay's [25] -like reals are also random r.e. reals. Solovay showed that any Chaitin number is -like. In this paper we show that the converse implication is true as well: any -like real in the unit interval is the halting probability of a universal self-delimiting Turing machine. Following Solovay [25] and Chaitin [11] we say that an r.e. real dominates an r.e. real if from a good approximation of from below one can compute a good approximation of from below. We shall study this relation and characterize it in terms of relations between r.e. sets. -like numbers are the maximal r.e. real numbers with respect to this order, that is, from a good approximation to an -like real one can compute a good approximation for every r.e. real. This property shows the strength of for approximation purposes. However, the situation is radically di erent if one wishes to compute digits of the binary expansion of an r.e. real: one cannot compute with a total recursive function the rst n digits of the r.e. real 0: K (the characteristic sequence of the halting problem) from the rst g(n) digits of , for any total recursive function g. The rst and third authors were partially supported by AURC A18/XXXXX/62090/F3414056, 1996. The second author was supported by DFG Research Grant No. HE 2489/2-1, and the fourth author was supported by a UARC Post-Doctoral Fellowship.
Uncertain Reasoning with Interval-Set Algebra

Y. Y. Yao,Xining Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-3238-7_22

1993-01-01

Abstract:An interval set is characterized by a pair of ordinary sets referred to as the lower and upper bounds. The interval-set algebra is different from the rough-set model with respect to the truth functionality of the set-theoretic operations. Based on a generalized version of possible-worlds analysis, we show that the interval-set algebra corresponds to Kleene’s three-valued logic K 3. The interval-set algebra is useful in interval-based qualitative and quantitative reasoning.
Recursively enumerable reals and Chaitin Ω numbers

Cristian S. Calude,Peter H. Hertling,Bakhadyr Khoussainov,Yongge Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3975(99)00159-0

2001-01-01

Abstract:A real α is called recursively enumerable if it is the limit of a recursive, increasing, converging sequence of rationals. Following Solovay (unpublished manuscript, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, May 1975, 215 pp.) and Chaitin (IBM J. Res. Develop. 21 (1977) 350–359, 496.) we say that an r.e. real α dominates an r.e. real β if from a good approximation of α from below one can compute a good approximation of β from below. We shall study this relation and characterize it in terms of relations between r.e. sets. Solovay's (unpublished manuscript, IBM Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, May 1975, 215 pp.) Ω-like numbers are the maximal r.e. real numbers with respect to this order. They are random r.e. real numbers. The halting probability of a universal self-delimiting Turing machine (Chaitin's Ω number (J. Assoc. Comput. Mach. 22 (1975) 329–340)) is also a random r.e. real. Solovay showed that any Chaitin Ω number is Ω-like. In this paper we show that the converse implication is true as well: any Ω-like real in the unit interval is the halting probability of a universal self-delimiting Turing machine.
Extending Answer Set Programming with Rational Numbers

Francesco Pacenza,Jessica Zangari

2023-12-07

Abstract:Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a widely used declarative programming paradigm that has shown great potential in solving complex computational problems. However, the inability to natively support non-integer arithmetic has been highlighted as a major drawback in real-world applications. This feature is crucial to accurately model and manage real-world data and information as emerged in various contexts, such as the smooth movement of video game characters, the 3D movement of mechanical arms, and data streamed by sensors. Nevertheless, extending ASP in this direction, without affecting its declarative nature and its well-defined semantics, poses non-trivial challenges; thus, no ASP system is able to reason natively with non-integer domains. Indeed, the widespread floating-point arithmetic is not applicable to the ASP case, as the reproducibility of results cannot be guaranteed and the semantics of an ASP program would not be uniquely and declaratively determined, regardless of the employed machine or solver. To overcome such limitations and in the realm of pure ASP, this paper proposes an extension of ASP in which non-integers are approximated to rational numbers, fully granting reproducibility and declarativity. We provide a well-defined semantics for the ASP-Core-2 standard extended with rational numbers and an implementation thereof. We hope this work could serve as a stepping stone towards a more expressive and versatile ASP language that can handle a broader range of real-world problems.

Artificial Intelligence,Logic in Computer Science,Programming Languages,Software Engineering
Rational Arithmetic with a Round-Off

V. P. Varin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965542524700398

2024-07-19

Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Physics

Abstract:Computations on a computer with a floating point arithmetic are always approximate. Conversely, computations with the rational arithmetic (in a computer algebra system, for example) are always absolutely exact and reproducible both on other computers and (theoretically) by hand. Consequently, these computations can be demonstrative in a sense that a proof obtained with their help is no different from a traditional one (computer assisted proof). However, usually such computations are impossible in a sufficiently complicated problem due to limitations on resources of memory and time. We propose a mechanism of rounding off rational numbers in computations with rational arithmetic, which solves this problem (of resources), i.e., computations can still be demonstrative but do not require unbounded resources. We give some examples of implementation of standard numerical algorithms with this arithmetic. The results have applications to analytical number theory.

mathematics, applied,physics, mathematical
Equivalence of the Traditional and Non-Standard Definitions of Concepts from Real Analysis

John Cowles,Ruben Gamboa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4204/EPTCS.152.8

2014-06-06

Abstract:ACL2(r) is a variant of ACL2 that supports the irrational real and complex numbers. Its logical foundation is based on internal set theory (IST), an axiomatic formalization of non-standard analysis (NSA). Familiar ideas from analysis, such as continuity, differentiability, and integrability, are defined quite differently in NSA-some would argue the NSA definitions are more intuitive. In previous work, we have adopted the NSA definitions in ACL2(r), and simply taken as granted that these are equivalent to the traditional analysis notions, e.g., to the familiar epsilon-delta definitions. However, we argue in this paper that there are circumstances when the more traditional definitions are advantageous in the setting of ACL2(r), precisely because the traditional notions are classical, so they are unencumbered by IST limitations on inference rules such as induction or the use of pseudo-lambda terms in functional instantiation. To address this concern, we describe a formal proof in ACL2(r) of the equivalence of the traditional and non-standards definitions of these notions.

Logic in Computer Science
Relational Algebraic Approach to the Real Numbers: The Least-Upper-Bound Property

Michael Winter

2024-04-16

Abstract:In this paper we continue the investigation of a real number object, i.e., an object representing the real numbers, in categories of relations. Our axiomatization is based on a relation algebraic version of Tarski's axioms of the real numbers. It was already shown that the addition of such an object forms a dense, linear ordered abelian group. In the current paper we will focus on the least-upper-bound property of such an object.

Logic
Semantics, Specification Logic, and Hoare Logic of Exact Real Computation

Ziegler,Martin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.46298/lmcs-20(2:17)2024

2024-06-25

Logical Methods in Computer Science

Abstract:We propose a simple imperative programming language, ERC, that features arbitrary real numbers as primitive data type, exactly. Equipped with a denotational semantics, ERC provides a formal programming language-theoretic foundation to the algorithmic processing of real numbers. In order to capture multi-valuedness, which is well-known to be essential to real number computation, we use a Plotkin powerdomain and make our programming language semantics computable and complete: all and only real functions computable in computable analysis can be realized in ERC. The base programming language supports real arithmetic as well as implicit limits; expansions support additional primitive operations (such as a user-defined exponential function). By restricting integers to Presburger arithmetic and real coercion to the `precision' embedding , we arrive at a first-order theory which we prove to be decidable and model-complete. Based on said logic as specification language for preconditions and postconditions, we extend Hoare logic to a sound (w.r.t. the denotational semantics) and expressive system for deriving correct total correctness specifications. Various examples demonstrate the practicality and convenience of our language and the extended Hoare logic.

computer science, theory & methods,logic
Quantifying Rational Belief

Ariel Caticha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3275647

2009-11-14

Abstract:Some criticisms that have been raised against the Cox approach to probability theory are addressed. Should we use a single real number to measure a degree of rational belief? Can beliefs be compared? Are the Cox axioms obvious? Are there counterexamples to Cox? Rather than justifying Cox's choice of axioms we follow a different path and derive the sum and product rules of probability theory as the unique (up to regraduations) consistent representations of the Boolean AND and OR operations.

Data Analysis, Statistics and Probability,Artificial Intelligence
Rational powers, invariant ideals, and the summation formula

Sankhaneel Bisui,Sudipta Das,Tài Huy Hà,Jonathan Montaño

2024-02-20

Abstract:We study the Rees valuations and rational powers of several classes of invariant ideals, providing explicit descriptions in terms of certain polyhedra. This allows us to show that a version of Musta\c{t}\u{a}-Takagi's summation formula for rational powers holds for these ideals. Moreover, for arbitrary ideals over the complex numbers, we prove a weaker version of this formula that holds for high enough rational numbers. Our methods lead to a definition of rational powers of ideal sheaves in normal complex varieties inspired by work of Lejeune-Jalabert-Teissier and Lazarsfeld.

Commutative Algebra
On the Rational Degree of Boolean Functions and Applications

Vishnu Iyer,Siddhartha Jain,Matt Kovacs-Deak,Vinayak M. Kumar,Luke Schaeffer,Daochen Wang,Michael Whitmeyer

2023-10-12

Abstract:We study a natural complexity measure of Boolean functions known as the (exact) rational degree. For total functions $f$, it is conjectured that $\mathrm{rdeg}(f)$ is polynomially related to $\mathrm{deg}(f)$, where $\mathrm{deg}(f)$ is the Fourier degree. Towards this conjecture, we show that symmetric functions have rational degree at least $\mathrm{deg}(f)/2$ and monotone functions have rational degree at least $\sqrt{\mathrm{deg}(f)}$. We observe that both of these lower bounds are tight. In addition, we show that all read-once depth-$d$ Boolean formulae have rational degree at least $\Omega(\mathrm{deg}(f)^{1/d})$. Furthermore, we show that almost every Boolean function on $n$ variables has rational degree at least $n/2 - O(\sqrt{n})$. In contrast to total functions, we exhibit partial functions that witness unbounded separations between rational and approximate degree, in both directions. As a consequence, we show that for quantum computers, post-selection and bounded-error are incomparable resources in the black-box model.

Computational Complexity,Quantum Physics
Quantitatively hyper-positive real rational functions II

Daniel Alpay,Izchak Lewkowicz

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.laa.2024.02.003

IF: 1.307

2024-03-17

Linear Algebra and its Applications

Abstract:Colloquially, quantitatively Hyper-Positive functions form a sub-family of the "Strictly Positive real" functions, where in addition state-space realization always exists and the limit at infinity is non-singular. In scalar terminology, such function maps the right-half of the complex plane into a sub-region of the right-half plane, which can be contained in a finite disk. Moreover, under inversion this disk is mapped onto itself. In [9] we showed that these functions appear in the "absolute stability" Lurie-type problems and characterized these families through their state-space realization, in the spirit of the Kalman-Yakubovich-Popov Lemma. Here, we present additional characterizations, i.e. as rational functions and through the corresponding kernels. Subsequently, a description of all solutions of the tangential Nevanlinna-Pick interpolation problem, in this framework, is presented.

mathematics, applied
Rational Proofs with Multiple Provers.

Jing Chen,Samuel McCauley,Shikha Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2840728.2840744

2015-01-01

Abstract:Interactive proofs model a world where a veri fi er delegates computation to an untrustworthy prover, verifying the prover's claims before accepting them. These proofs have applications to delegation of computation, probabilistically checkable proofs, crowdsourcing, and more.In some of these applications, the veri fi er may pay the prover based on the quality of his work. Rational proofs, introduced by Azar and Micali (2012), are an interactive proof model in which the prover is rational rather than untrustworthy-he may lie, but only to increase his payment. This allows the veri fi er to leverage the greed of the prover to obtain better protocols: while rational proofs are no more powerful than interactive proofs, the protocols are simpler and more e ffi cient. Azar and Micali posed as an open problem whether multiple provers are more powerful than one for rational proofs.We provide a model that extends rational proofs to allow multiple provers. In this model, a veri fi er can cross-check the answers received by asking several provers. The veri fi er can pay the provers according to the quality of their work, incentivizing them to provide correct information.We analyze rational proofs with multiple provers from a complexity- theoretic point of view. We fully characterize this model by giving tight upper and lower bounds on its power. On the way, we resolve Azar and Micali's open problem in the a ffi rmative, showing that multiple rational provers are strictly more powerful than one (under standard complexity- theoretic assumptions). We further show that the full power of rational proofs with multiple provers can be achieved using only two provers and fi ve rounds of interaction. Finally, we consider more demanding models where the veri fi er wants the provers' payment to decrease significantly when they are lying, and fully characterize the power of the model when the payment gap must be noticeable (i. e., at least 1/p where p is a polynomial).
The Eudoxus Reals

AJ Kumar,Reese Long,Andrew Tung,Ivan Wong

2023-10-02

Abstract:We examine a unique construction of the real numbers which proceeds directly from the integers using approximately linear-endomorphisms with finite error, called near-endomorphisms. In this paper, we show that the set of near-endomorphisms forms a complete ordered field isomorphic to the reals. Moreover, we show that there are uncountably many near-endomorphisms without reference to the reals. We then investigate a natural extension of near-endomorphisms, which we call quasi-homomorphisms, to other abelian groups. Extending prior results about the construction of the $p$-adic numbers and the rational adele ring, we find the ring of near-endomorphisms of certain localizations of the integers, and suggest further directions for exploration.

Number Theory
Integration on the Surreals

Ovidiu Costin,Philip Ehrlich

2024-07-05

Abstract:Conway's real closed field $\mathbf{No}$ of surreal numbers is a sweeping generalization of the real numbers and the ordinals to which a number of elementary functions such as log and exponentiation have been shown to extend. The problems of identifying significant classes of functions that can be so extended and of defining integration for them have proven to be formidable. In this paper we address this and related unresolved issues by showing that extensions to $\mathbf{No}$, and thereby integrals, exist for most functions arising in practical applications. In particular, we show they exist for a large subclass of the \emph{resurgent functions}, a subclass that contains the functions that at $\infty$ are semi-algebraic, semi-analytic, analytic, meromorphic, and Borel summable as well as solutions to nonresonant linear and nonlinear meromorphic systems of ODEs or of difference equations. By suitable changes of variables we deal with arbitrarily located singular points. We further establish a sufficient condition for the theory to carry over to ordered exponential subfields of $\mathbf{No}$ more generally and illustrate the result with structures familiar from the surreal literature. The extensions of functions and integrals that concern us are constructive in nature, which permits us to work in NBG less the Axiom of Choice (for both sets and proper classes). Following the completion of the positive portion of the paper, it is shown that the existence of such constructive extensions and integrals of substantially more general types of functions (e.g. smooth functions) is obstructed by considerations from the foundations of mathematics.

Logic

Rationally Querying the Reals

Defining Real Numbers as Oracles

Formalising Real Numbers in Homotopy Type Theory

Defining Integers

On Quantifiers for Quantitative Reasoning

Recursively enumerable reals and Chaitin numbers

Series Recursively Enumerable Reals and Chaitin Numbers

Uncertain Reasoning with Interval-Set Algebra

Recursively enumerable reals and Chaitin Ω numbers

Extending Answer Set Programming with Rational Numbers

Rational Arithmetic with a Round-Off

Equivalence of the Traditional and Non-Standard Definitions of Concepts from Real Analysis

Relational Algebraic Approach to the Real Numbers: The Least-Upper-Bound Property

Semantics, Specification Logic, and Hoare Logic of Exact Real Computation

Quantifying Rational Belief

Rational powers, invariant ideals, and the summation formula

On the Rational Degree of Boolean Functions and Applications

Quantitatively hyper-positive real rational functions II

Rational Proofs with Multiple Provers.

The Eudoxus Reals

Integration on the Surreals