Abstract:Phonological knowledge plays a pivotal role in many aspects of language processing, but it remains controversial whether it is required for writing. In the present study, we examined the issue by focusing on written production in an opaque logographic script (kanji) with highly irregular pronunciation rules, which allowed for a rigorous test of whether or not phonology contributes to writing. Using a phonological priming paradigm in two experiments, we measured response latency while participants orally named target pictures or wrote down their names in kanji. Each target was preceded by a phonographic character (kana) which represented the same sound (mora) as the beginning of the target name or a different mora. By manipulating the degree of phonological overlap between primes and target names (i.e., morae, consonants and vowels), we found that only the moraic overlap could speed up word production in logographic writing (Experiment 1). In contrast, naming response was facilitated by mora-overlap as well as vowel-overlap. This between-task difference in phonological encoding suggests that phonological codes for spoken production do not necessarily precede orthographic access during logographic writing. In Experiment 2, we further found that the facilitatory effects of moraic information did not differ in magnitude between writing and naming when primes were masked and presented more briefly, suggesting a net component of bottom-up phonological activation which contributes to logographic writing. Collectively, we propose that orthographic codes of kanji are accessed directly from semantics, whereas phonology plays a non-specific modulatory role to enhance neurocognitive systems involved in writing.

A Cognitive Account of the Puzzle of Ideography

A bigger problem for ideography: The pervasiveness of linguistic structure

Functional ideographies are composite semiotic systems

A multimodal parallel architecture: A cognitive framework for multimodal interactions

Why is language well-designed for communication? (Commentary on Christiansen and Chater: 'Language as shaped by the brain')

Iconicity as a General Property of Language: Evidence from Spoken and Signed Languages

Cognitive Grammar and gesture: Points of convergence, advances and challenges

Iconicity as structure mapping

Situating Language in the Real-World: The Role of Multimodal Iconicity and Indexicality

A Universal Cognitive Bias in Word Order: Evidence From Speakers Whose Language Goes Against It

The cognitive homunculus: do tunable languages-of-thought convey adaptive advantage?

Are language–cognition interactions bigger than a breadbox? Integrative modeling and design space thinking temper simplistic questions about causally dense phenomena

Phonology facilitates deeply opaque logographic writing

Cognitive grammar and aphasic discourse

A study in language and cognition.

The Lexicon of Emoji? Conventionality Modulates Processing of Emoji

A multimodal approach to coding discourse: Collaboration, distributed cognition, and geometric reasoning

Decoding intelligence via symmetry and asymmetry

Cognitive Development as a Piece of the Language Learning Puzzle

Word Forms Reflect Trade-Offs Between Speaker Effort and Robust Listener Recognition

Putting Geometry and Function Together — Towards a Psychologically-Plausible Computational Model for Spatial Language Comprehension