Abstract:With the growth and globalization of IC design and development, there is an increase in the number of Designers and Design houses. As setting up a fabrication facility may easily cost upwards of $20 billion, costs for advanced nodes may be even greater. IC design houses that cannot produce their chips in-house have no option but to use external foundries that are often in other countries. Establishing trust with these external foundries can be a challenge, and these foundries are assumed to be untrusted. The use of these untrusted foundries in the global semiconductor supply chain has raised concerns about the security of the fabricated ICs targeted for sensitive applications. One of these security threats is the adversarial infestation of fabricated ICs with a Hardware Trojan (HT) . An HT can be broadly described as a malicious modification to a circuit to control, modify, disable, or monitor its logic. Conventional VLSI manufacturing tests and verification methods fail to detect HT due to the different and un-modeled nature of these malicious modifications. Current state-of-the-art HT detection methods utilize statistical analysis of various side-channel information collected from ICs, such as power analysis, power supply transient analysis, regional supply current analysis, temperature analysis, wireless transmission power analysis, and delay analysis. To detect HTs, most methods require a Trojan-free reference golden IC. A signature from these golden ICs is extracted and used to detect ICs with HTs. However, access to a golden IC is not always feasible. Thus, a mechanism for HT detection is sought that does not require the golden IC. Machine Learning (ML) approaches have emerged to be extremely useful in helping eliminate the need for a golden IC. Recent works on utilizing ML for HT detection have been shown to be promising in achieving this goal. Thus, in this tutorial, we will explain utilizing ML as a solution to the challenge of HT detection. Additionally, we will describe the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) tool flow for automating ML-assisted HT detection. Moreover, to further discuss the benefits of ML-assisted HT detection solutions, we will demonstrate a Neural Network (NN) -assisted timing profiling method for HT detection. Finally, we will discuss the shortcomings and open challenges of ML-assisted HT detection methods.

Multi-criteria Hardware Trojan Detection: A Reinforcement Learning Approach

Trojan playground: a reinforcement learning framework for hardware Trojan insertion and detection

DETERRENT: Detecting Trojans using Reinforcement Learning

The Seeker's Dilemma: Realistic Formulation and Benchmarking for Hardware Trojan Detection

Deep Learning Based Approach for Hardware Trojan Detection

A Hardware-Trojans Detection Approach Based on eXtreme Gradient Boosting

A Cost-Driven Method for Deep-Learning-Based Hardware Trojan Detection

Hardware Trojans in Chips: A Survey for Detection and Prevention

Hardware Trojan Detection Combine with Machine Learning: an SVM-based Detection Approach

Hardware Trojan Detection Using Machine Learning: A Tutorial

The State-of-the-art in EDA tools: the Hardware Trojan Confrontation Framework

A Locating Method for Multi-Purposes HTs Based on the Boundary Network

An AI Architecture with the Capability to Classify and Explain Hardware Trojans

TPAD: Hardware Trojan Prevention and Detection for Trusted Integrated Circuits

Hiding in Plain Sight: Reframing Hardware Trojan Benchmarking as a Hide&Seek Modification

Hardware IP Assurance against Trojan Attacks with Machine Learning and Post-processing

AdaTest: Reinforcement Learning and Adaptive Sampling for On-chip Hardware Trojan Detection

TrojanForge: Generating Adversarial Hardware Trojan Examples Using Reinforcement Learning

Advancing the State-of-the-Art in Hardware Trojans Design

MacLeR: Machine Learning-based Run-Time Hardware Trojan Detection in Resource-Constrained IoT Edge Devices

Uncertainty-Aware Hardware Trojan Detection Using Multimodal Deep Learning