Lankeswar Dey,Maura A. McLaughlin,Haley M. Wahl,Paul B. Demorest,Zaven Arzoumanian,Harsha Blumer,Paul R. Brook,Sarah Burke-Spolaor,H. Thankful Cromartie,Megan E. DeCesar,Timothy Dolch,Justin A. Ellis,Robert D. Ferdman,Elizabeth C. Ferrara,William Fiore,Emmanuel Fonseca,Nate Garver-Daniels,Peter A. Gentile,Joseph Glaser,Deborah C. Good,Ross J. Jennings,Megan L. Jones,Michael T. Lam,Duncan R. Lorimer,Jing Luo,Ryan S. Lynch,Cherry Ng,David J. Nice,Timothy T. Pennucci,Nihan S. Pol,Scott M. Ransom,Renée Spiewak,Ingrid H. Stairs,Kevin Stovall,Joseph K. Swiggum

Abstract:Pulsar timing array experiments have recently uncovered evidence for a nanohertz gravitational wave background by precisely timing an ensemble of millisecond pulsars. The next significant milestones for these experiments include characterizing the detected background with greater precision, identifying its source(s), and detecting continuous gravitational waves from individual supermassive black hole binaries. To achieve these objectives, generating accurate and precise times of arrival of pulses from pulsar observations is crucial. Incorrect polarization calibration of the observed pulsar profiles may introduce errors in the measured times of arrival. Further, previous studies (e.g., van Straten 2013; Manchester et al. 2013) have demonstrated that robust polarization calibration of pulsar profiles can reduce noise in the pulsar timing data and improve timing solutions. In this paper, we investigate and compare the impact of different polarization calibration methods on pulsar timing precision using three distinct calibration techniques: the Ideal Feed Assumption (IFA), Measurement Equation Modeling (MEM), and Measurement Equation Template Matching (METM). Three NANOGrav pulsars-PSRs J1643$-$1224, J1744$-$1134, and J1909$-$3744-observed with the 800 MHz and 1.5 GHz receivers at the Green Bank Telescope (GBT) are utilized for our analysis. Our findings reveal that all three calibration methods enhance timing precision compared to scenarios where no polarization calibration is performed. Additionally, among the three calibration methods, the IFA approach generally provides the best results for timing analysis of pulsars observed with the GBT receiver system. We attribute the comparatively poorer performance of the MEM and METM methods to potential instabilities in the reference noise diode coupled to the receiver and temporal variations in the profile of the reference pulsar, respectively.

Multi-band Extension of the Wideband Timing Technique

The Indian Pulsar Timing Array: First data release

Measuring Pulse Times of Arrival from Broad-Band Pulsar Observations

Nanohertz Gravitational Wave Astronomy during the SKA Era: An InPTA perspective

Nanohertz gravitational wave astronomy during SKA era: An InPTA perspective

Improving DM estimates using low-frequency scattering-broadening estimates

The Green Bank North Celestial Cap Pulsar Survey III: 45 New Pulsar Timing Solutions

Low-frequency pulse-jitter measurement with the uGMRT I : PSR J0437–4715

Low-frequency pulse-jitter measurement with the uGMRT I : PSR J0437$-$4715

The Parkes Pulsar Timing Array Project: Second data release

Improving pulsar timing precision through superior Time-of-Arrival creation

The Green Bank North Celestial Cap Survey. VIII. 21 New Pulsar Timing Solutions

Pulsar Timing Errors from Asynchronous Multi-Frequency Sampling of Dispersion Measure Variations

Simultaneous multi-frequency single pulse observations of pulsars

Pulsar timing methods for evaluating dispersion measure time series

A Study of Multifrequency Polarization Pulse Profiles of Millisecond Pulsars

The International Pulsar Timing Array: First Data Release

From Spin Noise to Systematics: Stochastic Processes in the First International Pulsar Timing Array Data Release

Decade-long timing of four GMRT discovered millisecond pulsars

Exploring pulsar timing precision: A comparative study of polarization calibration methods for NANOGrav data from the Green Bank Telescope