Spatiotemporal gender differences in urban vibrancy

Thomas Collins,Riccardo Di Clemente,Mario Gutiérrez-Roig,Federico Botta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23998083231209073
2023-10-12
Abstract:Urban vibrancy is the dynamic activity of humans in urban locations. It can vary with urban features and the opportunities for human interactions, but it might also differ according to the underlying social conditions of city inhabitants across and within social surroundings. Such heterogeneity in how different demographic groups may experience cities has the potential to cause gender segregation because of differences in the preferences of inhabitants, their accessibility and opportunities, and large-scale mobility behaviours. However, traditional studies have failed to capture fully a high-frequency understanding of how urban vibrancy is linked to urban features, how this might differ for different genders, and how this might affect segregation in cities. Our results show that (1) there are differences between males and females in terms of urban vibrancy, (2) the differences relate to `Points of Interest` as well as transportation networks, and (3) that there are both positive and negative `spatial spillovers` existing across each city. To do this, we use a quantitative approach using Call Detail Record data--taking advantage of the near-ubiquitous use of mobile phones--to gain high-frequency observations of spatial behaviours across the seven most prominent cities of Italy. We use a spatial model comparison approach of the direct and `spillover` effects from urban features on male-female differences. Our results increase our understanding of inequality in cities and how we can make future cities fairer.
Physics and Society,Computers and Society
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper aims to explore the gender differences in urban vibrancy in both temporal and spatial dimensions, and to investigate how these differences are related to urban characteristics and how this relationship affects gender segregation in cities. Specifically, the paper attempts to address the following key questions: 1. **Gender differences in urban vibrancy**: Investigate the different performances of men and women in terms of urban vibrancy. 2. **Relationship between urban characteristics and urban vibrancy**: Analyze how specific urban characteristics (such as points of interest, transportation networks, etc.) influence urban vibrancy. 3. **Spatial spillover effects**: Explore the positive and negative spatial spillover effects in cities, i.e., how changes in one area affect surrounding areas. 4. **Impact of urban planning and design**: Discuss how these findings can be applied to urban planning and design to reduce gender segregation and promote a more equitable urban environment. To achieve these goals, the authors adopted a quantitative approach, utilizing Call Detail Record (CDR) data to obtain high-frequency observations of the spatial behavior of men and women in seven major cities in Italy. Additionally, they combined OpenStreetMap geographic data and residential census data, using spatial models to compare direct and spatial spillover effects to reveal the impact of urban characteristics on gender differences. In summary, the goal of this paper is to deepen our understanding of urban inequality by quantifying gender differences in urban vibrancy and to provide guidance for equitable urban planning in the future.