Abstract:Addressing the challenge of toxic language in online discussions is crucial for the development of effective toxicity detection models. This pioneering work focuses on addressing imbalanced datasets in toxicity detection by introducing a novel approach to augment toxic language data. We create a balanced dataset by instructing fine-tuning of Large Language Models (LLMs) using Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF). Recognizing the challenges in collecting sufficient toxic samples from social media platforms for building a balanced dataset, our methodology involves sentence-level text data augmentation through paraphrasing existing samples using optimized generative LLMs. Leveraging generative LLM, we utilize the Proximal Policy Optimizer (PPO) as the RL algorithm to fine-tune the model further and align it with human feedback. In other words, we start by fine-tuning a LLM using an instruction dataset, specifically tailored for the task of paraphrasing while maintaining semantic consistency. Next, we apply PPO and a reward function, to further fine-tune (optimize) the instruction-tuned LLM. This RL process guides the model in generating toxic responses. We utilize the Google Perspective API as a toxicity evaluator to assess generated responses and assign rewards/penalties accordingly. This approach guides LLMs through PPO and the reward function, transforming minority class samples into augmented versions. The primary goal of our methodology is to create a balanced and diverse dataset to enhance the accuracy and performance of classifiers in identifying instances from the minority class. Utilizing two publicly available toxic datasets, we compared various techniques with our proposed method for generating toxic samples, demonstrating that our approach outperforms all others in producing a higher number of toxic samples. Starting with an initial 16,225 toxic prompts, our method successfully generated 122,951 toxic samples with a toxicity score exceeding 30%. Subsequently, we developed various classifiers using the generated balanced datasets and applied a cost-sensitive learning approach to the original imbalanced dataset. The findings highlight the superior performance of classifiers trained on data generated using our proposed method. These results highlight the importance of employing RL and a data-agnostic model as a reward mechanism for augmenting toxic data, thereby enhancing the robustness of toxicity detection models.

Learn What NOT to Learn: Towards Generative Safety in Chatbots

Using In-Context Learning to Improve Dialogue Safety

Learning from data in the mixed adversarial non-adversarial case: Finding the helpers and ignoring the trolls

Improving Dialog Safety using Socially Aware Contrastive Learning

Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Models

Robust Conversational Agents against Imperceptible Toxicity Triggers

Constructing Highly Inductive Contexts for Dialogue Safety through Controllable Reverse Generation

Why So Toxic? Measuring and Triggering Toxic Behavior in Open-Domain Chatbots

Safe Generative Chats in a WhatsApp Intelligent Tutoring System

Anticipating Safety Issues in E2E Conversational AI: Framework and Tooling

Mitigating Unsafe Feedback with Learning Constraints

ToxicChat: Unveiling Hidden Challenges of Toxicity Detection in Real-World User-AI Conversation

How to Keep an Online Learning Chatbot From Being Corrupted

Chatbots and Mental Health: Insights into the Safety of Generative AI

Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning

Learning and Forgetting Unsafe Examples in Large Language Models

Towards Healthy AI: Large Language Models Need Therapists Too

AugmenToxic: Leveraging Reinforcement Learning to Optimize LLM Instruction Fine-Tuning for Data Augmentation to Enhance Toxicity Detection

Language Generation Models Can Cause Harm: So What Can We Do About It? An Actionable Survey

Generating Topic-Agnostic Conversations With LLMs

AI Safety in Generative AI Large Language Models: A Survey