Alejo Jose G. Sison,Marco Tulio Daza,Roberto Gozalo-Brizuela,Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán
Abstract:This article explores the ethical problems arising from the use of ChatGPT as a kind of generative AI and suggests responses based on the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) framework. The HCAI framework is appropriate because it understands technology above all as a tool to empower, augment, and enhance human agency while referring to human wellbeing as a grand challenge, thus perfectly aligning itself with ethics, the science of human flourishing. Further, HCAI provides objectives, principles, procedures, and structures for reliable, safe, and trustworthy AI which we apply to our ChatGPT assessments. The main danger ChatGPT presents is the propensity to be used as a weapon of mass deception (WMD) and an enabler of criminal activities involving deceit. We review technical specifications to better comprehend its potentials and limitations. We then suggest both technical (watermarking, styleme, detectors, and fact-checkers) and non-technical measures (terms of use, transparency, educator considerations, HITL) to mitigate ChatGPT misuse or abuse and recommend best uses (creative writing, non-creative writing, teaching and learning). We conclude with considerations regarding the role of humans in ensuring the proper use of ChatGPT for individual and social wellbeing.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper explores the ethical issues brought about by ChatGPT as a generative artificial intelligence (Generative AI) and proposes countermeasures based on the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) framework.
#### Main Issues
1. **ChatGPT as a "Weapon of Mass Deception"**:
- ChatGPT can generate highly coherent, natural, and human-like text, which users often trust even if the information is inaccurate.
- This capability may lead to its use as a tool for spreading misinformation, especially in academia and social media.
2. **Technical Potential and Limitations**:
- The paper provides a detailed analysis of ChatGPT's technical specifications, including its text generation capabilities and potential risks.
3. **Countermeasures**:
- Proposes technical measures (such as watermarking, style detection, fact-checking, etc.) and non-technical measures (such as terms of use, transparency, educator considerations, etc.) to reduce the misuse or abuse of ChatGPT.
- Also recommends best uses, such as creative writing, non-creative writing, teaching, and learning.
4. **Ethical Challenges**:
- The paper lists various ethical issues raised by ChatGPT, including bias, privacy invasion, job displacement, and the spread of misinformation on social media.
5. **Academic Fraud**:
- In academia, ChatGPT may be used to plagiarize others' research or cheat in exams.
- Incorrectly listed as a co-author of academic papers.
6. **Social Impact**:
- ChatGPT may be used to create fake news, fake reviews, or impersonate others for online fraud.
- In security and intelligence operations, false information generated by ChatGPT could exacerbate conflicts and incite public opinion.
7. **Criminal Activities**:
- ChatGPT can be used to automate the production of malware, conduct cyber-attacks, extortion, and other illegal activities.
#### Conclusion
The paper emphasizes the importance of human involvement in ensuring the proper use of ChatGPT and provides specific recommendations to promote individual and societal well-being. By combining technical and non-technical means, the negative impacts of ChatGPT can be effectively mitigated.