Comments on "New Insights from the 2003 Halloween Storm into the Colaba 1600 nT Magnetic Depression during the 1859 Carrington Storm" by S. Ohtani (2022)

Bruce T. Tsurutani,Gurbax S. Lakhina,Rajkumar Hajra
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA031034
2023-04-20
Abstract:The Colaba, India ~-1600 nT magnetic spike caused by an interplanetary sheath magnetic field inducing a "dayside R1-field aligned current wedge" during the Carrington magnetic storm proposed by Ohtani (2022, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JA030596" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) seems highly improbable. Normal interplanetary magnetic field intensities of ~5 nT have previously been shown to be sufficient to explain the ~+120 nT SI+ observed at Colaba during the storm (Tsurutani et al., 2018, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>). Magnetohydrodynamic theory (Kennel et al., 1985, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/GM034p0001" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) predicts a maximum of 4x magnetic field compression by a fast shock, giving an interplanetary sheath field of ~20 nT, a value too low to support the Ohtani (2022) hypothesis. The Ohtani (2022) (and Siscoe et al. 2006, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.02.102" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) claim of a further 10x amplification of the interplanetary sheath fields has not been verified in near-Earth interplanetary sheaths. The original (Tsurutani et al., 2003, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JA009504" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) hypothesis that an ICME magnetic cloud having southward magnetic fields of ~90 nT caused the Carrington magnetic storm main phase of peak SYM-H/Dst = -1760 nT seems more likely. The short time between the SI+ and the storm main phase onset implies a foreshortened interplanetary sheath. The extremely rapid recovery of the magnetic storm was hypothesized by Tsurutani et al. (2018, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JA024779" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) as being due to nonlinear ring current losses. We point out that the Hydro-Quebec 1989 storm was caused by multiple shock-sheaths and magnetic clouds (Lakhina & Tsurutani, 2016, <a class="link-external link-https" href="https://doi.org/10.1186/s40562-016-0037-4" rel="external noopener nofollow">this https URL</a>) unlike the interplanetary causes of the Carrington storm. The Hydro-Quebec event was a "stealth" magnetic storm.
Space Physics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?