Abstract:The classical Condorcet Jury Theorem considers a voting scenario in which there exists a candidate whose election would be ideal for each voter; each voter, though, has only a limited understanding of the world and is thus unable to determine exactly who this candidate is. The main question in this scenario is whether the voters, acting individually, can cast their ballots so that the unknown optimal candidate wins the election, and the welfare of the group of voters is maximized.In this setting, each candidate is represented by a known probability distribution over signals about the world that the voters can perceive, that is, over bits. One of these candidates is chosen (secretively, by an adversary) to be the ideal candidate. Afterwards, each voter samples this unknown candidate's distribution once and casts a ballot with the hope that the unknown ideal candidate wins the election.In this paper, we consider the famous Condorcet voting system, as well as some of its variants. First, we give a positive answer to an open question of Chierichetti and Kleinberg [8] , and show that, with Condorcet voting, there exists a uniform voting strategy that makes the group of voters succeed with probability 1−δ provided that Θ(εtv−2⋅ln⁡δ−1) voters take part in the election — here, εtv is the minimum total variation distance between the distributions of two candidates.We also give a uniform voting strategy for the Copeland voting system (a variant of Condorcet) that makes the group succeed with probability 1−δ with Θ(εH−2⋅ln⁡δ−1) voters, where εH is the minimum Hellinger distance between the distributions. Our uniform Copeland strategy, then, is an instance-optimal hypothesis testing algorithm: constants aside, the strategy is as efficient as the optimal omniscient algorithm which determines the unknown candidate after having directly observed each of the signals perceived by the voters. Then, we "derandomize" our uniform Copeland strategy, and obtain a Condorcet strategy that achieves instance-optimality at the cost of losing uniformity; finally, we prove that this loss of uniformity is necessary: no uniform Condorcet strategy can achieve instance-optimality, in general.Thus, the right voting strategies let these classical combinatorial voting systems attain the same efficiency of centralized, optimal, hypothesis testers.

Data as voters: instance selection using approval-based multi-winner voting

Instance-Ranking: A New Perspective to Consider the Instance Dependency for Classification

Evidential instance selection for K-nearest neighbor classification of big data

Bagged Voting Ensembles

Modeling Voters in Multi-Winner Approval Voting

Private Multi-Winner Voting for Machine Learning

Approval-Based Voting with Mixed Goods

Justifications for Generalizations of Approval Voting

Instance-Optimal Information-Based Voting

Representation with Incomplete Votes

Proportional Aggregation of Preferences for Sequential Decision Making

Abductive and Contrastive Explanations for Scoring Rules in Voting

DiRe Committee : Diversity and Representation Constraints in Multiwinner Elections

Comparing Ways of Obtaining Candidate Orderings from Approval Ballots

Learning Fair Policies for Multi-stage Selection Problems from Observational Data

Subset Selection Based On Multiple Rankings in the Presence of Bias: Effectiveness of Fairness Constraints for Multiwinner Voting Score Functions

Exploiting Social Influence to Control Elections Based on Scoring Rules

Proportional Representation in Metric Spaces and Low-Distortion Committee Selection

Multi-objective Evolutionary Instance Selection for Multi-label Classification

Optimal algorithms for multiwinner elections and the Chamberlin–Courant Rule