Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

Introducing Construct Theory as a Standard Methodology for Inclusive AI Models

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Inclusive Portraits: Race-Aware Human-in-the-Loop Technology

A Sociotechnical Lens for Evaluating Computer Vision Models: A Case Study on Detecting and Reasoning about Gender and Emotion

Rethinking Bias Mitigation: Fairer Architectures Make for Fairer Face Recognition

Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasets

A Conceptual Model for Inclusive Technology: Advancing Disability Inclusion through Artificial Intelligence

Dataset Scale and Societal Consistency Mediate Facial Impression Bias in Vision-Language AI

Casual Conversations v2: Designing a large consent-driven dataset to measure algorithmic bias and robustness

Comparing Human and Machine Bias in Face Recognition

Feminist AI: Can We Expect Our AI Systems to Become Feminist?

Stable Bias: Analyzing Societal Representations in Diffusion Models

The Pursuit of Fairness in Artificial Intelligence Models: A Survey

Communicating and combating algorithmic bias: effects of data diversity, labeler diversity, performance bias, and user feedback on AI trust

One Label, One Billion Faces: Usage and Consistency of Racial Categories in Computer Vision

Survey of Bias In Text-to-Image Generation: Definition, Evaluation, and Mitigation

Modeling Epistemological Principles for Bias Mitigation in AI Systems: An Illustration in Hiring Decisions

Explaining Bias in Deep Face Recognition via Image Characteristics

Understanding Fairness of Gender Classification Algorithms Across Gender-Race Groups

Data quality dimensions for fair AI

AI and Identity