Abstract:Computer vision technologies have been applied to an increasingly wide range of applications from autonomous car navigation, to medical image analysis, to precision agriculture. Despite many of these exciting innovations, recent studies reveal a number of risks in using existing computer vision systems, suggesting results of such systems may be unfair or untrustworthy. For example, major commercial facial analysis tools were shown to have substantial accuracy disparities for people of different gender or with different skin colors (Buolamwini and Gebru 2018). Visual semantic role labeling models were found to exhibit societal biases and stereotypes (Zhao et al. 2017) such as frequently associating certain activity labels with specific gender (e.g., associate “cooking” with woman). Even worse, seemly accurate image classifiers may in fact made the predictions by picking up spurious correlations between objects and irrelevant background information rather than identifying meaningful features of the objects (Ribeiro, Singh, and Guestrin 2016). Many of the risks embedded in modern computer vision systems can be attributed to the use of a training dataset that is biased. Indeed, the computer vision community has long recognized that many visual datasets present varying degrees of build-in bias due to factors such as photographic style of photographers and selection from dataset curators (Torralba, Efros, and others 2011). Using these biased datasets to train machine learning models for addressing different computer vision tasks naturally leads to the phenomenon of “bias in, bias out” and results in undesirable performance. Thus, to mitigate the fairness, accountability, and transparency concerns in computer vision, a crucial step is to start the entire pipeline with high-quality visual datasets that, at least, are authentic representations of the visual world. In other words, being able to detect potential biases hidden in the datasets prior to model development is a key step in guarding against unfair or untrustworthy outcomes in computer vision. While a few techniques have been developed to automatically detect dataset biases (Tramer et al. 2017), the nonstructured nature of visual data makes bias discovery in image datasets particularly challenging. This is because no human-comprehensive attributes can be directly leveraged

What Should Be Balanced in a "Balanced" Face Recognition Dataset?

Toward Fairer Face Recognition Datasets

Discovering Biases in Image Datasets with the Crowd

Surveying Racial Bias in Facial Recognition: Balancing Datasets and Algorithmic Enhancements

The Impact of Balancing Real and Synthetic Data on Accuracy and Fairness in Face Recognition

A Deep Dive into Dataset Imbalance and Bias in Face Identification

Exploring Causes of Demographic Variations In Face Recognition Accuracy

Fairness Index Measures to Evaluate Bias in Biometric Recognition

Addressing Racial Bias in Facial Emotion Recognition

Rethinking Common Assumptions to Mitigate Racial Bias in Face Recognition Datasets

Fairness Under Cover: Evaluating the Impact of Occlusions on Demographic Bias in Facial Recognition

Investigating Bias and Fairness in Facial Expression Recognition

On the Potential of Algorithm Fusion for Demographic Bias Mitigation in Face Recognition

Benchmarking Algorithmic Bias in Face Recognition: An Experimental Approach Using Synthetic Faces and Human Evaluation

Evaluating Proposed Fairness Models for Face Recognition Algorithms

FairFace: Face Attribute Dataset for Balanced Race, Gender, and Age

Metrics for Dataset Demographic Bias: A Case Study on Facial Expression Recognition

Synthetic Data for the Mitigation of Demographic Biases in Face Recognition

A Comprehensive Study on Face Recognition Biases Beyond Demographics