Abstract:Randomized benchmarking (RB) is a widely used strategy to assess the quality of available quantum gates in a computational context. RB involves applying known random sequences of gates to an initial state and using the statistics of a final measurement step to determine an effective depolarizing error per step of the sequence, which is a metric of gate quality. Here we investigate the advantages of fully randomized benchmarking, where a new random sequence is drawn for each experimental trial. The advantages of full randomization include smaller confidence intervals on the inferred step error, the ability to use maximum likelihood analysis without heuristics, straightforward optimization of the sequence lengths, and the ability to model and measure behaviors that go beyond the typical assumption of time-independent error rates. We discuss models of time-dependent or non-Markovian errors that generalize the basic RB model of a single exponential decay of the success probability. For any of these models, we implement a concrete protocol to minimize the uncertainty of the estimated parameters given a fixed time constraint on the complete experiment, and we implement a maximum likelihood analysis. We consider several previously published experiments and determine the potential for improvements with optimized full randomization. We experimentally observe such improvements in Clifford randomized benchmarking experiments on a single trapped ion qubit at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). For an experiment with uniform lengths and intentionally repeated sequences the step error was $2.42^{+0.30}_{-0.22}\times 10^{-5}$, and for an optimized fully randomized experiment of the same total duration the step error was $2.57^{+0.07}_{-0.06}\times 10^{-5}$. We find a substantial decrease in the uncertainty of the step error as a result of optimized fully randomized benchmarking.

Randomized compiling for subsystem measurements

Quasi-Probabilistic Readout Correction of Mid-Circuit Measurements for Adaptive Feedback via Measurement Randomized Compiling

Randomized compiling in fault-tolerant quantum computation

Noise-mitigated randomized measurements and self-calibrating shadow estimation

Randomized benchmarking in measurement-based quantum computing

Randomized Benchmarking of Quantum Gates

Improved quantum error correction with randomized compiling

Mitigating Measurement Errors in Quantum Computers by Exploiting State-Dependent Bias

Benchmarking quantum logic operations relative to thresholds for fault tolerance

Measurement Error Mitigation via Truncated Neumann Series

Learning to Measure: Adaptive Informationally Complete Generalized Measurements for Quantum Algorithms

Measuring error rates of mid-circuit measurements

Optimized experiment design and analysis for fully randomized benchmarking

Stochastic errors in quantum instruments

Detecting and Eliminating Quantum Noise of Quantum Measurements

Counting collisions in random circuit sampling for benchmarking quantum computers

The Error Reconstruction and Compiled Calibration of Quantum Computing Cycles

Measurement-Based Quantum Compiling via Gauge Invariance

Noise-resilient phase estimation with randomized compiling

Synergetic quantum error mitigation by randomized compiling and zero-noise extrapolation for the variational quantum eigensolver

Practical techniques for high precision measurements on near-term quantum hardware: a Case Study in Molecular Energy Estimation