Abstract:Quantifying structural similarity between complex networks presents a fundamental and formidable challenge in network science, which plays a crucial role in various fields, such as bioinformatics, social science, and economics, and serves as an effective method for network classification, temporal network evolution and network generated model evaluation, etc. Traditional network comparison methods often rely on simplistic structural properties such as node degree and network distance. However, these methods only consider the local or global aspect of a network, leading to inaccuracies in network similarity assessments. In this paper, we introduce a network similarity comparison method based on the high-order structure. This innovative approach takes into account both the global and local structures of a network, resulting in a more comprehensive and accurate quantification of the network difference. Specifically, we construct distributions of higher-order clustering coeffcients and distance between nodes within a network. The JensenShannon divergence, based on these two distributions, is used to quantitatively measure the similarity between two networks, offering a more refined and robust measure of network similarity. To validate the effectiveness of our proposed method, we conducted a series of comprehensive experiments on both artificial and real-world networks, spanning various domains and applications. By meticulously fine-tuning the parameters associated with three distinct artificial network generation models, we systematically compared the performance of our method under a wide range of parameter settings within the same network. In addition, we generated four different network models with varying levels of randomization, creating a diverse set of test cases to evaluate the method's robustness and adaptability. In artificial networks, our study rigorously compared our proposed method with other baseline techniques, consistently demonstrating its superior accuracy and stability through experimental results; In real networks, we selected datasets from diverse domains and confirmed the reliability of our method by conducting extensive similarity assessments between real networks and their perturbed reconstructed counterparts. Furthermore, in real networks, the rigorous comparison between our method and null models underscored its robustness and stability across a broad spectrum of scenarios and applications. Finally, a meticulous sensitivity analysis of the parameters revealed that our method exhibited remarkable performance consistency across networks of different types, scales, and complexities.

Metrics for network comparison using egonet feature distribution

An egonet-based approach to effective weighted network comparison

Network mutual information measures for graph similarity

Quantification of network structural dissimilarities based on network embedding

Directed Network Comparison Using Motifs

Measuring and utilizing temporal network dissimilarity

Enhancing Community Detection in Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Local Metrics and Hierarchical Algorithms

Network Comparison on Structural Mining

Quantifying Network Similarity using Graph Cumulants

On Efficient Network Similarity Measures.

A Comparative Analysis of New Graph Distance Measures and Graph Edit Distance

Empirical Reference Distributions for Networks of Different Size

Feature Extraction from Degree Distribution for Comparison and Analysis of Complex Networks

Research on Network Similarity Comparison Method Based on Higher-Order Information

Measuring Similarity of Graphs and their Nodes by Neighbor Matching

Metric projection for dynamic multiplex networks

Comparison of Graph Distance Measures for Movie Similarity Using a Multilayer Network Model

Geodesic Distance Between Graphs: A Spectral Metric for Assessing the Stability of Graph Neural Networks

A graph theory based similarity metric enables comparison of subpopulation psychometric networks.