Abstract:We study fair division of goods under the broad class of generalized assignment constraints. In this constraint framework, the sizes and values of the goods are agent-specific, and one needs to allocate the goods among the agents fairly while further ensuring that each agent receives a bundle of total size at most the corresponding budget of the agent. Since, in such a constraint setting, it may not always be feasible to partition all the goods among the agents, we conform -- as in recent works -- to the construct of charity to designate the set of unassigned goods. For this allocation framework, we obtain existential and computational guarantees for envy-free (appropriately defined) allocation of divisible and indivisible goods, respectively, among agents with individual, additive valuations for the goods. We deem allocations to be fair by evaluating envy only with respect to feasible subsets. In particular, an allocation is said to be feasibly envy-free (FEF) iff each agent prefers its bundle over every (budget) feasible subset within any other agent's bundle (and within the charity). The current work establishes that, for divisible goods, FEF allocations are guaranteed to exist and can be computed efficiently under generalized assignment constraints. In the context of indivisible goods, FEF allocations do not necessarily exist, and hence, we consider the fairness notion of feasible envy-freeness up to any good (FEFx). We show that, under generalized assignment constraints, an FEFx allocation of indivisible goods always exists. In fact, our FEFx result resolves open problems posed in prior works. Further, for indivisible goods and under generalized assignment constraints, we provide a pseudo-polynomial time algorithm for computing FEFx allocations, and a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) for computing approximate FEFx allocations.

Breaking the Envy Cycle: Best-of-Both-Worlds Guarantees for Subadditive Valuations

Best-of-Both-Worlds Fairness of the Envy-Cycle-Elimination Algorithm

Best-of-Both-Worlds Fair Allocation of Indivisible and Mixed Goods

Almost Envy-Freeness with General Valuations

Almost Envy-free Allocation of Indivisible Goods: A Tale of Two Valuations

Fair and Efficient Allocations under Subadditive Valuations

Guaranteeing Envy-Freeness under Generalized Assignment Constraints

For One and All: Individual and Group Fairness in the Allocation of Indivisible Goods

Achieving Envy-Freeness with Limited Subsidies under Dichotomous Valuations

Finding Fair Allocations under Budget Constraints

Symmetrically Fair Allocations of Indivisible Goods

Fair Division of Mixed Divisible and Indivisible Goods

Envy-freeness up to any item with high Nash welfare: The virtue of donating items

Almost Envy Freeness and Welfare Efficiency in Fair Division with Goods or Bads

On Interim Envy-Free Allocation Lotteries

Average Envy-freeness for Indivisible Items

Fair Division through Information Withholding

Towards Optimal Subsidy Bounds for Envy-freeable Allocations

Epistemic EFX Allocations Exist for Monotone Valuations

Almost Envy-free Repeated Matching in Two-sided Markets