Self-Ordering Point Clouds

Pengwan Yang,Cees G. M. Snoek,Yuki M. Asano
2023-04-10
Abstract:In this paper we address the task of finding representative subsets of points in a 3D point cloud by means of a point-wise ordering. Only a few works have tried to address this challenging vision problem, all with the help of hard to obtain point and cloud labels. Different from these works, we introduce the task of point-wise ordering in 3D point clouds through self-supervision, which we call self-ordering. We further contribute the first end-to-end trainable network that learns a point-wise ordering in a self-supervised fashion. It utilizes a novel differentiable point scoring-sorting strategy and it constructs an hierarchical contrastive scheme to obtain self-supervision signals. We extensively ablate the method and show its scalability and superior performance even compared to supervised ordering methods on multiple datasets and tasks including zero-shot ordering of point clouds from unseen categories.
Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
This paper attempts to address the problem of finding a representative subset of points in 3D point clouds. Specifically, the authors propose a self-supervised method to rank points in 3D point clouds, thereby selecting a subset of points with significance. This method does not require any labels or annotations, effectively reducing the dimensionality of point cloud data, improving computational, memory, and communication efficiency, and is applicable to scenarios such as autonomous driving, scene understanding, and virtual reality. ### Background of the Paper - **Challenges**: 3D point cloud data typically contains tens of thousands or even millions of points, making it very difficult to process this data. Existing methods mostly rely on supervised learning, requiring a large amount of labeled data, which is not only costly but also very difficult to annotate in practical applications (such as data captured by on-board LiDAR sensors). - **Existing Methods**: Most existing point cloud ranking methods rely on supervised learning and require labeled data. These methods include random point selection, Euclidean distance-based selection, and importance-based ranking. However, these methods all require a large amount of manual labeling, limiting their scalability and practical application. ### Contributions of the Paper 1. **Self-Supervised Point Cloud Ranking**: The authors propose the concept of self-supervised point cloud ranking, ranking points in 3D point clouds through self-supervised learning without any labeled data. 2. **End-to-End Trainable Network**: The authors developed an end-to-end trainable network that utilizes a novel differentiable point scoring-ranking strategy and a hierarchical contrastive learning scheme to achieve self-supervised signal acquisition. 3. **Superior Performance**: Experimental results show that this method not only performs well on multiple datasets and tasks but also surpasses supervised methods in some downstream tasks, including zero-shot point cloud ranking. ### Method Overview - **Problem Definition**: Given a 3D point cloud \( P = \{p_i\}_{i=1}^N \), the goal is to find a ranking \(\gamma^* = (i_1, i_2, \ldots, i_N)\) such that these points perform optimally in downstream tasks. - **Challenges**: The challenge of this problem lies in the fact that the ranking objective is based on the performance of downstream tasks, but the ranking itself is generated from unlabeled data. Additionally, the permutation operation is inherently non-differentiable, making it very difficult to learn the ranking directly using gradient descent. - **Solution**: - **Differentiable Scoring-Ranking Module**: By introducing a differentiable scoring-ranking module, each point in the point cloud is scored and ranked based on the scores. - **Hierarchical Contrastive Learning**: By constructing a hierarchical contrastive loss function, self-supervised signals are generated from subsets of different sizes, ensuring the effectiveness of the ranking. ### Experimental Results - **Ablation Study**: The authors validated the impact of various hyperparameters through a series of ablation experiments, including the subset size controller \(\theta\), sigmoid temperature \(\tau\), and feature dimension size \(D\). - **Benchmarking**: Compared with random selection, farthest point sampling (FPS), and supervised point ranking methods, the results show that this method performs well in classification, retrieval, and reconstruction tasks. ### Conclusion This paper proposes a self-supervised 3D point cloud ranking method, achieving efficient point cloud processing without labeled data through a differentiable scoring-ranking module and hierarchical contrastive learning. Experimental results show that this method performs excellently in multiple tasks and has broad application prospects.