Abstract:This paper focuses on solving the linear quadratic regulator problem for discrete-time linear systems without knowing system matrices. The classical Q-learning methods for linear systems can be divided into Q-learning value iteration and Q-learning policy iteration. Q-learning value iteration converges at a linear convergence rate. Q-learning policy iteration has a second-order convergence rate but requires an initial stabilizing control policy. This paper aims to propose efficient model-free algorithms for solving the optimal control problem without requiring an initial stabilizing control policy. In this paper, we first present an equivalent problem for an auxiliary system with the same optimal control policy as the LQR problem A Q-learning algorithm is proposed to solve the equivalent problem, which is proven to converge monotonically to the optimal solution. The convergence rate of the Q-learning algorithm is heavily dependent on the auxiliary system, so we introduce a model-free homotopy method based on Q-learning to solve the LQR problem. This homotopy method can achieve the optimal solution in a finite number of iterations by solving an LQR problem in each iteration. Additionally, we propose a Q-learning Lyapunov iteration algorithm to solve the equivalent problem for an auxiliary system and analyze its properties. Finally, two examples are provided to demonstrate our results. Note to Practitioners —This paper proposes several Q-learning methods to solve the linear quadratic regulator problem for discrete-time linear systems. On the one hand, it is difficult to know the exact system dynamics knowledge in actual engineering, so this paper is devoted to developing model-free algorithms. On the other hand, this paper focuses on the LQR problem because it is widely spread in practical applications. We propose several model-free algorithms to solve the LQR problem, which provides the basis for optimal control of actual applications. Similar to policy iteration, our algorithms need to solve the Lyapunov equation. The advantage of our methods is that all of our algorithms do not have strict constraints on initial conditions compared with policy iteration. The properties of every algorithm proposed in this paper are provided. In addition, we focus on the efficiency of algorithms to obtain the optimal control policy faster. Two practical examples are used to verify the effectiveness of our methods. Finally, the applicable situations of each algorithm are summarized in the conclusion.

On the Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Gaussian Regulator

Direct Data-Driven Discounted Infinite Horizon Linear Quadratic Regulator with Robustness Guarantees

Sample Complexity of the Linear Quadratic Regulator: A Reinforcement Learning Lens

Learning Robust Data-based LQG Controllers from Noisy Data

Learning to Control under Uncertainty with Data-Based Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator

A Note on Linear Quadratic Regulator and Kalman Filter

Least-Squares Temporal Difference Learning for the Linear Quadratic Regulator

Learning the Linear Quadratic Regulator from Nonlinear Observations

Convergence Analysis of Overparametrized LQR Formulations

Robust Sampled-Data Control for Uncertain Nonlinear Systems

Mixed Regular and Impulsive Sampled-data LQR

Control-Oriented Identification for the Linear Quadratic Regulator: Technical Report

On the Certainty-Equivalence Approach to Direct Data-Driven LQR Design

Non-Episodic Learning for Online LQR of Unknown Linear Gaussian System

The Power of Linear Controllers in LQR Control

The Quadratic-Quadratic Regulator Problem: Approximating feedback controls for quadratic-in-state nonlinear systems

Q-Learning Methods for LQR Control of Completely Unknown Discrete-Time Linear Systems

Unconstrained feedback controller design using Q-learning from noisy process data

On the Sample Complexity of Decentralized Linear Quadratic Regulator with Partially Nested Information Structure

Data-Driven LQR with Finite-Time Experiments via Extremum-Seeking Policy Iteration