Abstract:Cloud computing environments increasingly provision field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) for their programmability and hardware-level parallelism. While FPGAs are typically used by one tenant at a time, multitenant schemes supporting spatial sharing of cloud FPGA resources have been proposed in the literature. However, the spatial multitenancy of FPGAs opens up new attack surfaces. Investigating potential security threats to multitenant FPGAs is thus essential for better understanding and eventually mitigating the security risks. This work makes a notable step forward by systematically analyzing the combined threat of FPGA power wasters and satisfiability don’t-care hardware Trojans in shared cloud FPGAs. We demonstrate a successful remote undervolting attack that activates a hardware Trojan concealed within a victim FPGA design and exploits the payload. The attack is carried out entirely remotely, assuming two spatially colocated FPGA users isolated from one another. The victim user’s circuit is infected with a Trojan, triggered by a pair of don’t-care signals that never reach the combined trigger condition during regular operation. The adversary, targeting the exploitation of the Trojan, deploys power waster circuits to lower the supply voltage of the FPGA. The assumption is that, under the effect of the lowered voltage, don’t-care signals may reach the particular state that triggers the Trojan. We name this exploit X-Attack and demonstrate its feasibility on an embedded FPGA and real-world cloud FPGA instances. Additionally, we study the effects of various attack tuning parameters on the exploit’s success. Finally, we discuss potential countermeasures against this security threat and present a lightweight self-calibrating countermeasure. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work on undervolting-based fault-injection attacks in multitenant FPGAs to demonstrate the attack on commercially available cloud FPGA instances.

Pentimento: Data Remanence in Cloud FPGAs

Security Risks Due to Data Persistence in Cloud FPGA Platforms

Mitigating Voltage Attacks in Multi-Tenant FPGAs

Engaging Heterogeneous FPGAs in the Cloud.

X-Attack 2.0: The Risk of Power Wasters and Satisfiability Don’t-Care Hardware Trojans to Shared Cloud FPGAs

Power Side-Channel Attacks on BNN Accelerators in Remote FPGAs

Patching FPGAs: The Security Implications of Bitstream Modifications

Securing Cloud FPGAs Against Power Side-Channel Attacks: A Case Study on Iterative AES

Hacking the Fabric: Targeting Partial Reconfiguration for Fault Injection in FPGA Fabrics

SoK: On the Security Challenges and Risks of Multi-Tenant FPGAs in the Cloud

Trusted Configuration in Cloud FPGAs

ShEF: Shielded Enclaves for Cloud FPGAs

Remote side-channel analysis of the loop PUF using a TDC-based voltage sensor

DARPT: defense against remote physical attack based on TDC in multi-tenant scenario

FuncTeller: How Well Does eFPGA Hide Functionality?

A Covert Attack Method Against FPGA Clouds

Memory Scraping Attack on Xilinx FPGAs: Private Data Extraction from Terminated Processes

Enabling FPGAs in the cloud.

DeepStrike: Remotely-Guided Fault Injection Attacks on DNN Accelerator in Cloud-FPGA

Multi-Tenant Cloud FPGA: A Survey on Security

Security of Cloud FPGAs: A Survey