Abstract:The globalization of the Integrated Circuit(IC) supply chain has shifted most design, manufacturing, and testing processes from a single trusted entity to a variety of untrusted third-party entities in various parts of the world. The use of untrusted Third-Party Intellectual Property(3PIP) can expose a design to significant risk of having Hardware Trojans(HTs) implanted by adversaries. These hardware trojans may cause degradation of the original design, information leakage, or even irreversible damage at the physical level, seriously jeopardizing consumer privacy, security, and company reputation. Various hardware trojan detection approaches proposed in the existing literature have the following drawbacks: the reliance on golden reference model, the requirement for test vector coverage and even the need for manual code review. At the same time, with the increase of the scale of integrated circuits, the hardware trojans with low trigger rate are more difficult to be detected Therefore, to address the above problems, a graph neural network-based HT detection method is proposed that enables the detection of gate-level hardware trojans without the need for golden reference model as well as logic tests. Graph Sample and AGgrEgate(GraphSAGE) is used to learn the high-dimensional graph features in the gate-level netlist and the attributed node features. Then supervised learning is employed for the training of the detection model. The detection capability of models with different aggregation methods and data balancing methods are explored. An average recall of 92.9% and an average F1 score of 86.2% under the evaluation of the Synopsys 90 nm generic library(SAED) based benchmark in Trust-Hub are achieved by the model, which is an 8.4% improvement in F1 score compared to state of the art. When applied to the dataset with larger data volume based on 250 nm generic library(LEDA), the average recall and F1 of combined logic type are 83.6% and 70.8% respectively, and the average recall and F1 score of timing logic type are 95.0% and 92.8% respectively.

Graph Neural Networks for Hardware Vulnerability Analysis -- Can you Trust your GNN?

Embracing Graph Neural Networks for Hardware Security (Invited Paper)

PoisonedGNN: Backdoor Attack on Graph Neural Networks-based Hardware Security Systems

FP-GNN: A Graph Neural Network for Hardware Trojan Detection in Gate-Level Netlist

Ignnvd: A Novel Software Vulnerability Detection Model Based on Integrated Graph Neural Networks

Devil in Disguise: Breaching Graph Neural Networks Privacy through Infiltration

A Portable Hardware Trojan Detection Using Graph Attention Networks

AttackGNN: Red-Teaming GNNs in Hardware Security Using Reinforcement Learning

A Unioned Graph Neural Network Based Hardware Trojan Node Detection

Effective Backdoor Attack on Graph Neural Networks in Spectral Domain

GNN4IP: Graph Neural Network for Hardware Intellectual Property Piracy Detection

Unnoticeable Backdoor Attacks on Graph Neural Networks

Contrastive Graph Convolutional Networks for Hardware Trojan Detection in Third Party IP Cores

Hardware Trojan Detection for Gate-level Netlists Based on Graph Neural Network

Transferable Graph Backdoor Attack

Graph Neural Backdoor: Fundamentals, Methodologies, Applications, and Future Directions

Single-node attacks for fooling graph neural networks

A backdoor attack against link prediction tasks with graph neural networks

PyGFI: Analyzing and Enhancing Robustness of Graph Neural Networks Against Hardware Errors

GANI: Global Attacks on Graph Neural Networks Via Imperceptible Node Injections

Towards Practical Edge Inference Attacks Against Graph Neural Networks