Sebastian T. Braun,Jan Stuhler
Abstract:With 70 million dead, World War II remains the most devastating conflict in history. Of the survivors, millions were displaced, returned maimed from the battlefield, or spent years in captivity. We examine the impact of such wartime experiences on labor market careers and show that they often become apparent only at certain life stages. While war injuries reduced employment in old age, former prisoners of war postponed their retirement. Many displaced workers, particularly women, never returned to employment. These responses are in line with standard life-cycle theory and thus likely extend to other conflicts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### Problems the Paper Attempts to Solve
This paper explores the long-term impact of wartime experiences during World War II on the labor market careers of survivors. Specifically, the author focuses on three common wartime consequences: battlefield injuries, being taken prisoner, and displacement. By analyzing the effects of these experiences over an individual's life cycle, the paper reveals how these wartime shocks manifest at different life stages, particularly highlighting their more pronounced impact in later life.
### Main Research Content
1. **Research Background**:
- World War II was one of the deadliest conflicts in history, resulting in approximately 70 million deaths and millions more injured, captured, or displaced.
- The author focuses on male survivors from the West German birth cohort of 1919-21, examining the impact of wartime experiences on their labor market careers.
2. **Data Sources**:
- Primarily uses data from the German Life History Study (GHS), which covers the complete education, employment, and family histories of the 1919-21 birth cohort.
- Supplemented with data from the 1970 Population and Occupation Census to analyze the impact on different age groups.
3. **Research Methods**:
- Adopts a life cycle perspective, tracking individuals from education to retirement.
- Compares the career trajectories of individuals who experienced battlefield injuries, were prisoners of war for more than six months, or were displaced, with those who did not experience these events.
4. **Main Findings**:
- **Battlefield Injuries**: Veterans who were injured had lower employment rates in old age and a higher likelihood of early retirement. Wartime injuries reduced their employment rate at age 60 by 14.7 percentage points, but this impact was mainly observed after age 60.
- **Being Taken Prisoner**: Veterans who were prisoners of war for more than six months delayed their retirement, with an employment rate at age 60 that was 8 percentage points higher than soldiers who were not captured. However, their career achievements were lower.
- **Displacement**: The impact of displacement varied across different age groups. For those born around 1930, displacement resulted in the greatest loss of human capital. Conversely, those displaced during childhood gained more educational opportunities. Female displaced persons had particularly low reemployment rates, with less than half of women in certain age groups returning to work after displacement.
5. **Theoretical Framework**:
- The findings are consistent with the standard Ben-Porath model, which considers endogenous retirement decisions. For example, being taken prisoner reduced the number of working years, thereby lowering the incentive to invest in education and delaying retirement.
### Conclusion
Through a life cycle perspective, this paper provides a detailed analysis of the long-term impact of wartime experiences during World War II on the labor market careers of survivors. The study shows that the effects of these wartime shocks are particularly significant in later life, and different types of wartime experiences have varying impacts on individuals' career trajectories. These findings not only help to understand the impact of World War II but also provide a reference for similar issues in other conflicts.