Abstract:Software testability represents the degree of ease with which a software artifact supports testing. When it is easy to detect defects in a program through testing, the program has high testability; otherwise, the testability of the program is low. As an abstract property of programs, testability can be measured by various metrics, which are affected by different factors of design and implementation. In object-oriented software development, code visibility is important to support design principles, such as information hiding. It is widely believed that code visibility has some effects on testability. However, little empirical evidence has been shown to clarify whether and how software testability is influenced by code visibility. We have performed a comprehensive empirical study to shed light on this problem. We first use code coverage as a concrete proxy for testability. We select 27 real-world software programs as subjects and ran two state-of-the-art automated testing tools, Randoop and EvoSuite, on these programs to analyze their code coverage, in comparison with that of developer-written tests. The results show that code visibility does not necessarily have effects on code coverage, but can significantly affect automated tools. Developer-written tests achieve similar coverage on code areas with different visibility, while low code visibility often leads to low code coverage for automated tools. In addition, we have developed two enhanced variants of Randoop that implement multiple strategies to handle code visibility. The results on Randoop variants show that different treatments on code visibility can result in significant differences in code coverage for automated tools. In the second part, our study uses fault detection rate as another concrete measurement of testability. We apply the automated testing tools on 357 real faults. The result of our in-depth analysis is consistent with that of the first part, demonstrating the significant effects of code visibility on program testability.

Using causal inference and Bayesian statistics to explain the capability of a test suite in exposing software faults

Causal Testing: Finding Defects' Root Causes

Enhancing Performance of Random Testing Through Markov Chain Monte Carlo Methods

Applications of Causality and Causal Inference in Software Engineering

Testing Causality in Scientific Modelling Software

Towards Causal Analysis of Empirical Software Engineering Data: The Impact of Programming Languages on Coding Competitions

Applying Bayesian Data Analysis for Causal Inference about Requirements Quality: A Controlled Experiment

The Unnecessity of Assuming Statistically Independent Tests in Bayesian Software Reliability Assessments

Demonstrating software reliability using possibly correlated tests: Insights from a conservative Bayesian approach

Reasoning-Based Software Testing

Valid Inference After Causal Discovery

A Practical Approach to Explaining Defect Proneness of Code Commits by Causal Discovery

Causality and Association: The Statistical and Legal Approaches

Enabling Runtime Verification of Causal Discovery Algorithms with Automated Conditional Independence Reasoning

Reducing Test Cases with Causality Partitions.

Bayesian causal inference in automotive software engineering and online evaluation

An Empirical Study on the Effects of Code Visibility on Program Testability

An ensemble meta-estimator to predict source code testability

Simulation Experiments as a Causal Problem

Causal Reasoning in Software Quality Assurance: A Systematic Review

Methods and tools for causal discovery and causal inference