Abstract:Background: Machine learning (ML) methods have shown great potential in predicting colorectal cancer (CRC) survival. However, the ML models introduced thus far have mainly focused on binary outcomes and have not considered the time-to-event nature of this type of modeling. Objective: This study aims to evaluate the performance of ML approaches for modeling time-to-event survival data and develop transparent models for predicting CRC-specific survival. Methods: The data set used in this retrospective cohort study contains information on patients who were newly diagnosed with CRC between December 28, 2012, and December 27, 2019, at West China Hospital, Sichuan University. We assessed the performance of 6 representative ML models, including random survival forest (RSF), gradient boosting machine (GBM), DeepSurv, DeepHit, neural net-extended time-dependent Cox (or Cox-Time), and neural multitask logistic regression (N-MTLR) in predicting CRC-specific survival. Multiple imputation by chained equations method was applied to handle missing values in variables. Multivariable analysis and clinical experience were used to select significant features associated with CRC survival. Model performance was evaluated in stratified 5-fold cross-validation repeated 5 times by using the time-dependent concordance index, integrated Brier score, calibration curves, and decision curves. The SHapley Additive exPlanations method was applied to calculate feature importance. Results: A total of 2157 patients with CRC were included in this study. Among the 6 time-to-event ML models, the DeepHit model exhibited the best discriminative ability (time-dependent concordance index 0.789, 95% CI 0.779-0.799) and the RSF model produced better-calibrated survival estimates (integrated Brier score 0.096, 95% CI 0.094-0.099), but these are not statistically significant. Additionally, the RSF, GBM, DeepSurv, Cox-Time, and N-MTLR models have comparable predictive accuracy to the Cox Proportional Hazards model in terms of discrimination and calibration. The calibration curves showed that all the ML models exhibited good 5-year survival calibration. The decision curves for CRC-specific survival at 5 years showed that all the ML models, especially RSF, had higher net benefits than default strategies of treating all or no patients at a range of clinically reasonable risk thresholds. The SHapley Additive exPlanations method revealed that R0 resection, tumor-node-metastasis staging, and the number of positive lymph nodes were important factors for 5-year CRC-specific survival. Conclusions: This study showed the potential of applying time-to-event ML predictive algorithms to help predict CRC-specific survival. The RSF, GBM, Cox-Time, and N-MTLR algorithms could provide nonparametric alternatives to the Cox Proportional Hazards model in estimating the survival probability of patients with CRC. The transparent time-to-event ML models help clinicians to more accurately predict the survival rate for these patients and improve patient outcomes by enabling personalized treatment plans that are informed by explainable ML models.

Interpretable machine learning for time-to-event prediction in medicine and healthcare

Deep Semisupervised Multitask Learning Model and Its Interpretability for Survival Analysis.

Hospital Length of Stay Prediction Based on Multi-modal Data Towards Trustworthy Human-AI Collaboration in Radiomics

Interpretable Machine Learning for Survival Analysis

Explainable machine learning to inform real-world evidence: A case study on small cell lung cancer survival analysis.

Interpretable Machine Learning Classifiers for Brain Tumour Survival Prediction

Interpretability of machine learning‐based prediction models in healthcare

Towards Interpretability and Personalization - A Predictive Framework for Clinical Time-series Analysis.

Predicting Colorectal Cancer Survival Using Time-to-Event Machine Learning: Retrospective Cohort Study

Towards the Interpretability of Machine Learning Predictions for Medical Applications Targeting Personalised Therapies: A Cancer Case Survey

Interpretable meta-learning of multi-omics data for survival analysis and pathway enrichment

Towards Explainable Machine Learning for Prediction of Disease Progression

Model‐agnostic explanations for survival prediction models

Interpretable Representation Learning for Healthcare via Capturing Disease Progression through Time

Bringing Modern Machine Learning into Clinical Practice Through the Use of Intuitive Visualization and Human–Computer Interaction

Comparative analysis of explainable machine learning prediction models for hospital mortality

Explainable machine learning can outperform Cox regression predictions and provide insights in breast cancer survival

predicTTE: An accessible and optimal tool for time-to-event prediction in neurological diseases

SurvSHAP(t): Time-dependent explanations of machine learning survival models

When will the mist clear? On the Interpretability of Machine Learning for Medical Applications: a survey

Missing Values and Imputation in Healthcare Data: Can Interpretable Machine Learning Help?